Chris Chapleo

1.6k total citations
32 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Chris Chapleo is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Marketing. According to data from OpenAlex, Chris Chapleo has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Strategy and Management, 13 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 11 papers in Marketing. Recurrent topics in Chris Chapleo's work include Corporate Identity and Reputation (18 papers), Management and Marketing Education (11 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers). Chris Chapleo is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Identity and Reputation (18 papers), Management and Marketing Education (11 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (9 papers). Chris Chapleo collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and Spain. Chris Chapleo's co-authors include Wai Wai Ko, Gordon Liu, Chris Simms, María Victoria Carrillo Durán, Helen O’Sullivan, Paul A. Clark, Kati Suomi, Heather Hartwell, Ann Hemingway and Juliet Memery and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Business Research and Journal of Business Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Chris Chapleo

31 papers receiving 914 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Chris Chapleo United Kingdom 20 449 342 317 242 177 32 1.0k
Jonathan Ivy United Kingdom 10 246 0.5× 211 0.6× 118 0.4× 101 0.4× 164 0.9× 11 675
Øyvind Helgesen Norway 13 372 0.8× 727 2.1× 429 1.4× 261 1.1× 89 0.5× 20 1.2k
Cláudia Simões Portugal 17 560 1.2× 563 1.6× 742 2.3× 597 2.5× 92 0.5× 32 1.5k
Melodena Stephens Balakrishnan United Arab Emirates 14 153 0.3× 237 0.7× 199 0.6× 421 1.7× 57 0.3× 43 1.1k
Maureen Brookes United Kingdom 17 420 0.9× 205 0.6× 89 0.3× 173 0.7× 99 0.6× 34 801
Ruth Ä. Schmidt United Kingdom 18 238 0.5× 212 0.6× 313 1.0× 202 0.8× 83 0.5× 49 976
Azadeh Shafaei Australia 15 236 0.5× 240 0.7× 261 0.8× 137 0.6× 38 0.2× 36 806
Marta Pedraja Iglesias Spain 15 198 0.4× 479 1.4× 333 1.1× 366 1.5× 59 0.3× 62 1.2k
Tony Woodall United Kingdom 9 139 0.3× 302 0.9× 322 1.0× 137 0.6× 58 0.3× 21 670
Paul A. Argenti United States 14 608 1.4× 288 0.8× 331 1.0× 280 1.2× 67 0.4× 29 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Chris Chapleo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chris Chapleo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chris Chapleo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chris Chapleo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chris Chapleo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chris Chapleo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chris Chapleo. The network helps show where Chris Chapleo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chris Chapleo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chris Chapleo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chris Chapleo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chris Chapleo. Chris Chapleo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Sullivan, Helen, et al.. (2024). Contemporary Branding Strategies for Higher Education. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(3). 1292–1311. 4 indexed citations
2.
Grigore, Georgiana, et al.. (2023). Employer branding dimensions: An adapted scale for Eastern Europe. Journal of Strategic Marketing. 32(4). 447–466. 4 indexed citations
3.
Durán, María Victoria Carrillo, et al.. (2023). Enhancing non-profit engagement: the extended model of webpage engagement and adoption for strategic management. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 10(1).
4.
Suomi, Kati, et al.. (2019). Dilemmas in Re-branding a University—“Maybe People Just Don’t Like Change”: Linking Meaningfulness and Mutuality into the Reconciliation. Corporate Reputation Review. 23(2). 92–105. 9 indexed citations
5.
Clark, Paul A., Chris Chapleo, & Kati Suomi. (2019). Branding higher education: an exploration of the role of internal branding on middle management in a university rebrand. Tertiary Education and Management. 26(2). 131–149. 39 indexed citations
6.
Chapleo, Chris, et al.. (2018). A brand within a brand: an integrated understanding of internal brand management and brand architecture in the public sector. Journal of Brand Management. 26(3). 277–290. 23 indexed citations
7.
Ko, Wai Wai, et al.. (2018). External supply chain flexibility and product innovation performance. European Journal of Marketing. 52(9/10). 1981–2004. 23 indexed citations
8.
Chapleo, Chris & Helen O’Sullivan. (2017). Contemporary thought in higher education marketing. Journal of Marketing for HIGHER EDUCATION. 27(2). 159–161. 30 indexed citations
9.
Liu, Gordon, Wai Wai Ko, & Chris Chapleo. (2016). How and When Socially Entrepreneurial Nonprofit Organizations Benefit From Adopting Social Alliance Management Routines to Manage Social Alliances?. Journal of Business Ethics. 151(2). 497–516. 25 indexed citations
10.
Hartwell, Heather, et al.. (2015). Workplace foodservice; perception of quality and trust. Appetite. 97. 169–175. 23 indexed citations
11.
Hytti, Ulla, et al.. (2014). Challenges in delivering brand promise – focusing on municipal health care organisations. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2014(1). 15288–15288. 1 indexed citations
12.
Chapleo, Chris. (2014). An exploration of branding approaches in UK universities. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 20(1). 1–11. 20 indexed citations
13.
Chapleo, Chris. (2013). Brand ‘infrastructure’ in nonprofit organizations: Challenges to successful brand building?. Journal of Marketing Communications. 21(3). 199–209. 24 indexed citations
14.
Liu, Gordon, et al.. (2013). The Role of Internal Branding in Nonprofit Brand Management. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly. 44(2). 319–339. 27 indexed citations
15.
Chapleo, Chris. (2012). What is the Secret of Successful University Brands?. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 2(1). 1–13. 1 indexed citations
16.
Chapleo, Chris. (2011). Exploring rationales for branding a university: Should we be seeking to measure branding in UK universities?. Journal of Brand Management. 18(6). 411–422. 86 indexed citations
17.
Chapleo, Chris & Chris Simms. (2010). Stakeholder analysis in higher education. Perspectives Policy and Practice in Higher Education. 14(1). 12–20. 65 indexed citations
18.
Chapleo, Chris. (2010). What defines “successful” university brands?. International Journal of Public Sector Management. 23(2). 169–183. 140 indexed citations
19.
Chapleo, Chris. (2006). Is Communications a Strategic Activity in UK Education?. 6(4). 306–314. 1 indexed citations
20.
Chapleo, Chris. (2005). Do Universities Have “Successful” Brands?. 6(1). 54–64. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026