Ching‐Mei Lee

1.3k citations
17 papers · 994 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ching‐Mei Lee

16 papers receiving 937 citations

Peers

Ching‐Mei Lee
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Social Psychology 374
  • Education 370
  • Communication 85
  • Applied Psychology 50
  • Clinical Psychology 207
Replace Ellen Selkie with:
Ellen Selkie United States
Mona Khoury-Kassabri Israel
Laura Marciano Switzerland
Ferrán Viñas Spain
Hailey G. Holmgren United States
Yalçın Özdemir Türkiye
Eleni C. Tzavela Greece
Samuel E. Ehrenreich United States
David S. Bickham United States
Ludwig Bilz Germany
Ching‐Mei Lee relative to Ellen Selkie United States Ellen Selkie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ellen Selkie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Mei Lee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Mei Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Mei Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Mei Lee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Mei Lee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Mei Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Mei Lee. The network helps show where Ching‐Mei Lee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Mei Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ching‐Mei Lee Line = papers co-authored together Ching‐Mei Lee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2014264
2 2013185
3 201496
4 201470
5 201568
6 201464
7 200662
8 201354
9 201450
10 201637
11 201415
12 200811
13 20048
14 20125
15 20133
16 20142
17 20110

About Ching‐Mei Lee

Ching‐Mei Lee is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Education, having authored 17 papers that have together received 994 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (2 papers), Community Health and Development (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (374 citations), Education (370 citations), Communication (85 citations), Applied Psychology (50 citations) and Clinical Psychology (207 citations). Ching‐Mei Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Fong‐Ching Chang, Chiung‐Hui Chiu, Ping‐Hung Chen, Nae‐Fang Miao, Jeng‐Tung Chiang, Ying-Chun Pan, Pi‐Hsia Lee, Hung‐Yi Chuang, Randy M. Page and Chuhsing Kate Hsiao. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Psychology, Journal of School Health, Addiction, International Journal of Public Health and Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact