Cheng‐Chia Yang

41 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

Cheng‐Chia Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 82
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 114
  • Information Systems and Management 57
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 46
  • Research and Theory 5
Replace Colin Ayre with:
Colin Ayre United Kingdom
Enas Almanasreh Australia
Tracey Shea Australia
Hannah Pazderka Canada
Ivan Steenstra Canada
Kristinn Tómasson Iceland
E. M. de Croon Netherlands
Lisa Mackay New Zealand
Anneli Leppänen Finland
Bryan Cleal Denmark
Cheng‐Chia Yang relative to Colin Ayre United Kingdom Colin Ayre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Colin Ayre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheng‐Chia Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheng‐Chia Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheng‐Chia Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheng‐Chia Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheng‐Chia Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheng‐Chia Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheng‐Chia Yang. The network helps show where Cheng‐Chia Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Cheng‐Chia Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Cheng‐Chia Yang Line = papers co-authored together Cheng‐Chia Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202172
2 201961
3 200947
4 202341
5 202237
6 201534
7 202231
8 202031
9 202126
10 202126
11 202125
12 202225
13 202125
14 202024
15 202221
16 202217
17 202117
18 202312
19 202412
20 202011

About Cheng‐Chia Yang

Cheng‐Chia Yang is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Demography and Neurology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 690 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migraine and Headache Studies (8 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (4 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (3 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (3 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (82 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (114 citations), Information Systems and Management (57 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (46 citations) and Research and Theory (5 citations). Cheng‐Chia Yang has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yu-Chia Chang, Ching‐Mao Chang, Shang‐Yu Yang, Yi‐Shun Wang, Chun‐Pai Yang, Chun-Pai Yang, Shuu‐Jiun Wang, Yi‐Hsuan Lee, Cheng Liu and Kuan‐Pin Su. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Nutrients, Brain Behavior and Immunity, Current Pain and Headache Reports and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact