Charlotte Cloutier

1.3k citations
17 papers · 776 indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 9

Charlotte Cloutier

16 papers receiving 741 citations

Hit Papers

What Makes a Process Theoretical Contribution?203202020262022202450100150200

Peers

Charlotte Cloutier
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 302
  • Public Administration 90
  • Strategy and Management 229
  • Business and International Management 27
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 94
Replace Mary B. Dunn with:
Mary B. Dunn United States
Gary Burke United Kingdom
Simona Giorgi United States
Simon Lilley United Kingdom
Frances Hesselbein
Kristina Jaskyte United States
Lotte S. Lüscher Denmark
Bryant A. Hudson United States
Ermanno Tortia Italy
Laurie Mook United States
Charlotte Cloutier relative to Mary B. Dunn United States Mary B. Dunn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Mary B. Dunn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte Cloutier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte Cloutier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte Cloutier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte Cloutier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte Cloutier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte Cloutier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte Cloutier. The network helps show where Charlotte Cloutier may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Charlotte Cloutier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charlotte Cloutier Line = papers co-authored together Charlotte Cloutier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20244
3 20235
4 202215
5
Using tables to enhance trustworthiness in qualitative researchbreakdown →
2020142
6
What Makes a Process Theoretical Contribution?breakdown →
2020203
7 201951
8 201512
9 201535
10 201535
11 2015103
12 20151
13 2013162
14 20131
15 20113
16 20111
17 19822

About Charlotte Cloutier

Charlotte Cloutier is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Public Administration and Urban Studies, having authored 17 papers that have together received 776 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (11 papers), Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (4 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (3 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (2 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (302 citations), Public Administration (90 citations) and Strategy and Management (229 citations). Charlotte Cloutier has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ann Langley, Davide Ravasi, Jean‐Louis Denis, Lise Lamothe, Linda Rouleau and Jean‐François Soublière. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of Management Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026