Laurie Mook

1.4k citations
46 papers · 803 indexed · h-index 17

Laurie Mook

44 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers

Laurie Mook
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Public Administration 80
  • Finance 169
  • Strategy and Management 185
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 116
  • Demography 130
Replace Florentine Maier with:
Florentine Maier Austria
Karen A. Froelich United States
Georg von Schnurbein Switzerland
Malin Arvidson Sweden
Bernd Helmig Germany
Leandro Sepúlveda United Kingdom
Helen Irvine Australia
Kate Cooney United States
Miriam Glucksmann United Kingdom
Al James United Kingdom
Laurie Mook relative to Florentine Maier Austria Florentine Maier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Florentine Maier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laurie Mook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laurie Mook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laurie Mook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laurie Mook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laurie Mook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laurie Mook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laurie Mook. The network helps show where Laurie Mook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Laurie Mook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laurie Mook Line = papers co-authored together Laurie Mook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20245
2 202016
3 20208
4 201910
5 201630
6
Concurrent or integrated hybridity? Exploring offline and online citizen participation in invited spaces
20165
7 20156
8
Stakeholders’ stories of impact: the case of Furniture Bank
20141
9 20147
10 201322
11 20124
12 201018
13
To Develop and Operationalize a Social Accounting Model That Can Be Applied to Social Enterprises
20081
14 200728
15
The Moral High Ground: Perceptions of Wage Differentials Among Executive Directors of Canadian Nonprofits
20079
16 200799
17
Organisational Perspectives on the Value of Volunteer Labour
20063
18 200617
19 200354
20 20003

About Laurie Mook

Laurie Mook is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Finance and Public Administration, having authored 46 papers that have together received 803 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (16 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (8 papers), Social Sciences and Governance (7 papers), Cooperative Studies and Economics (6 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (6 papers), Social Capital and Networks (5 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (4 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (80 citations), Finance (169 citations) and Strategy and Management (185 citations). Laurie Mook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jack Quarter, Femida Handy, Betty Jane Richmond, Daniel Schugurensky, Lili Wang, Andrea Chan, Alex Murdock, Ann Armstrong, Antony Chum and Jingyu Li. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly and Research on Social Work Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026