Charles Docherty

17 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Charles Docherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Research and Theory 26
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 118
  • Leadership and Management 7
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
  • Education 160
Replace Kim Mitchell with:
Kim Mitchell Canada
Margaret Moorman United States
Marilou Bélisle Canada
Briyana L. M. Morrell United States
Pam Nelmes United Kingdom
Rita Mojtahedzadeh Iran
Valda Frommolt Australia
Shoaleh Bigdeli Iran
Keith Postlethwaite United Kingdom
Susan Copley Cobb United States
Charles Docherty relative to Kim Mitchell Canada Kim Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
Kim Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Docherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Docherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Docherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Docherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Docherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Docherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Docherty. The network helps show where Charles Docherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Charles Docherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Docherty Line = papers co-authored together Charles Docherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2007155
2 200551
3 200029
4 201621
5 201814
6 201514
7 202113
8
The need for simulation in surgical education in developing countries. The wind of change. Review article.
201913
9 201611
10 201710
11 19858
12 20044
13 20213
14 19942
15 20232
16 20092
17
The structure and content of the nursing component of a pilot electronic health record for the cardiac managed clinical network in Scotland.
20061

About Charles Docherty

Charles Docherty is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Speech and Hearing and General Health Professions, having authored 17 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Problem and Project Based Learning (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (2 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (26 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (118 citations), Leadership and Management (7 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations) and Education (160 citations). Charles Docherty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Majd T. Mrayyan, Nabeel Al‐Yateem, Rachel Rossiter, Kathleen Duffy, Craig Heron, Pervaiz Hashmi, Sharon Brownie, Obada Hasan, Naveed Anwar and Naila Nadeem. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of School Nursing, Journal of Pediatric Nursing, Labour / Le Travail, Nurse Education Today and Journal of the Textile Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact