Kim Mitchell

664 total citations
38 papers, 401 citations indexed

About

Kim Mitchell is a scholar working on Education, Literature and Literary Theory and Research and Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Mitchell has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 401 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Education, 9 papers in Literature and Literary Theory and 8 papers in Research and Theory. Recurrent topics in Kim Mitchell's work include Writing and Handwriting Education (8 papers), Nursing education and management (8 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (8 papers). Kim Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Writing and Handwriting Education (8 papers), Nursing education and management (8 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (8 papers). Kim Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Kim Mitchell's co-authors include Diana E. McMillan, Kendra L. Rieger, Alexander M. Clark, Michelle Lobchuk, Lisa Demczuk, Rasheda Rabbani, Nathan Nickel, Christina West, Shannon D. Scott and Rishma Chooniedass and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Educational Psychology Review and The Annals of Family Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Kim Mitchell

34 papers receiving 382 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kim Mitchell Canada	13	150	84	67	58	55	38	401
Fátima Pereira Portugal	11	262 1.7×	65 0.8×	45 0.7×	9 0.2×	17 0.3×	61	468
Pip Hardy United Kingdom	5	65 0.4×	63 0.8×	64 1.0×	32 0.6×	10 0.2×	12	331
Kathryn Hibbert Canada	13	165 1.1×	67 0.8×	62 0.9×	39 0.7×	82 1.5×	38	411
Shirley O’Neill Australia	11	106 0.7×	33 0.4×	90 1.3×	47 0.8×	38 0.7×	37	276
Jennifer Chicca United States	7	105 0.7×	68 0.8×	49 0.7×	5 0.1×	22 0.4×	22	397
Peggy Proctor Canada	8	214 1.4×	80 1.0×	36 0.5×	13 0.2×	55 1.0×	14	394
Susie Kim United States	9	34 0.2×	133 1.6×	53 0.8×	24 0.4×	35 0.6×	17	433
André Vågan Norway	7	95 0.6×	89 1.1×	24 0.4×	9 0.2×	20 0.4×	23	273
Sofia Nyström Sweden	12	190 1.3×	85 1.0×	53 0.8×	7 0.1×	25 0.5×	33	387

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Mitchell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Mitchell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Mitchell. The network helps show where Kim Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Mitchell. Kim Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Moore, Theresa HM, Sarah Dawson, Kim Kirby, et al.. (2025). Point-of-care tests in the emergency medical services: a scoping review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 33(1). 18–18. 4 indexed citations

Mitchell, Kim. (2024). Does reading ability predict student success? A scoping review. Nurse Education Today. 136. 106150–106150. 2 indexed citations

Kirby, Kim, Andy Gibson, Theresa HM Moore, et al.. (2024). A multiple criteria decision analysis to establish the use cases and candidate point of care tests to enter into a platform trial of multiple in vitro diagnostic point of care tests in the prehospital environment. NIHR Open Research. 4. 29–29. 1 indexed citations

Harder, Nicole, et al.. (2024). Exploring Debriefing Modalities in Healthcare Simulation: Self-Reflection, Self-Debriefing, Tele-Debriefing and Facilitated Debriefing. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 92. 101561–101561. 5 indexed citations

Mitchell, Kim. (2024). Individual and Collective Self-Efficacy for Teaching Writing in a Multidisciplinary Sample of Canadian Faculty. Érudit (Université de Montréal). 34. 127–156.

Mitchell, Kim. (2023). Language as a proxy for race: Language and literacy and the nursing profession. Nursing Inquiry. 30(4). e12565–e12565.

Collins, Emma, et al.. (2023). The Effects of Mental Health First Aid Preparation on Nursing Student Self-Efficacy in Their Response to Mental Health Issues. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(2). 6–6. 1 indexed citations

Mitchell, Kim, et al.. (2022). Exploring integrated threshold concept knowledge as a route to understanding the epistemic nature of the evidence-based practice mindset. Journal of Professional Nursing. 42. 34–45. 7 indexed citations

Mitchell, Kim, et al.. (2022). Should the concepts chosen to guide concept-based curricula be threshold concepts?. Nurse Education Today. 120. 105614–105614. 1 indexed citations

10.

Mitchell, Kim, et al.. (2021). Reflective writing pedagogies in action: a qualitative systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 18(1). 7 indexed citations

11.

Rieger, Kendra L., Kim Mitchell, Rasheda Rabbani, et al.. (2021). Evaluating the impact of an arts-based multimedia knowledge translation assignment on undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today. 105. 105030–105030. 6 indexed citations

12.

Mitchell, Kim, et al.. (2021). Development and validation of the Situated Academic Writing Self-Efficacy Scale (SAWSES). Assessing Writing. 48. 100524–100524. 33 indexed citations

13.

Mitchell, Kim, et al.. (2020). Seeking transformation: how students in nursing view their academic writing context – a qualitative systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship. 17(1). 7 indexed citations

14.

Mitchell, Kim, et al.. (2020). Strategies for retention of nursing students: A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice. 50. 102956–102956. 27 indexed citations

15.

Mitchell, Kim, Diana E. McMillan, & Rasheda Rabbani. (2019). An Exploration of Writing Self-Efficacy and Writing Self-Regulatory Behaviours in Undergraduate Writing. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10(2). 14 indexed citations

16.

Mitchell, Kim, Diana E. McMillan, Michelle Lobchuk, & Nathan Nickel. (2018). Psychometric Testing of a New Instrument to Measure Writing Self-Efficacy: A Proposed Mixed-Methods Delphi Study. 1 indexed citations

17.

Mitchell, Kim. (2018). Constructing Writing Practices in Nursing. Journal of Nursing Education. 57(7). 399–407. 28 indexed citations

18.

Rieger, Kendra L., Christina West, Amanda Kenny, et al.. (2018). Digital storytelling as a method in health research: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews. 7(1). 41–41. 50 indexed citations

19.

Mitchell, Kim & Diana E. McMillan. (2018). A curriculum-wide assessment of writing self-efficacy in a baccalaureate nursing program. Nurse Education Today. 70. 20–27. 13 indexed citations

20.

Mitchell, Kim, et al.. (1998). ‘Being there’: learning throughactive participation. Nurse Education Today. 18(3). 226–230. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact