Chad M. Stefaniak
- Accounting top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 2%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Richard W. HoustonJohn L. AbernathyAdi MasliBrooke BeyerDuane M. BrandonJesse C. RobertsonRichard C. HatfieldWilliam F. Messier
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (29 papers)Accounting and Organizational Management (12 papers)Risk Management in Financial Firms (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNorwayIreland
In The Last Decade
Chad M. Stefaniak
28 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Accounting 832
- Strategy and Management 310
- Management Information Systems 248
- Information Systems and Management 96
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 88
Countries citing papers authored by Chad M. Stefaniak
This map shows the geographic impact of Chad M. Stefaniak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chad M. Stefaniak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chad M. Stefaniak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chad M. Stefaniak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chad M. Stefaniak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chad M. Stefaniak. The network helps show where Chad M. Stefaniak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chad M. Stefaniak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chad M. Stefaniak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chad M. Stefaniak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chad M. Stefaniak. Chad M. Stefaniak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 66 | |
| 9 | 106 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | The Association between Characteristics of Audit Committee Accounting Experts, Audit Committee Chairs, and Financial Reporting Timeliness | 1 |
| 13 | 160 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | 98 | |
| 18 | 80 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Chad M. Stefaniak
Chad M. Stefaniak is a scholar working on Accounting, Management Information Systems and Safety Research, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (29 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (12 papers) and Risk Management in Financial Firms (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (832 citations), Management Information Systems (248 citations) and Strategy and Management (310 citations). Chad M. Stefaniak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Richard W. Houston, John L. Abernathy, Adi Masli, Brooke Beyer, Duane M. Brandon, Jesse C. Robertson, Richard C. Hatfield, William F. Messier, Larry E. Rittenberg and Mary B. Curtis. Their work appears in journals such as The Accounting Review, Accounting Organizations and Society and Contemporary Accounting Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.