Jaime J. Schmidt

1.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
41 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Jaime J. Schmidt is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance. According to data from OpenAlex, Jaime J. Schmidt has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Accounting, 16 papers in Strategy and Management and 7 papers in Finance. Recurrent topics in Jaime J. Schmidt's work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (36 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (14 papers). Jaime J. Schmidt is often cited by papers focused on Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (36 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (14 papers). Jaime J. Schmidt collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jaime J. Schmidt's co-authors include Michael S. Wilkins, Anne Thompson, Clive S. Lennox, Steven J. Kachelmeier, Kristen Valentine, Julie S. Persellin, Scott D. Vandervelde, Linda A. Myers, Marsha B. Keune and Dann G. Fisher and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Accounting and Economics, Journal of Accounting Research and The Accounting Review.

In The Last Decade

Jaime J. Schmidt

40 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

Why are expanded audit reports not informative to investo... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 25 50 75 100

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jaime J. Schmidt United States 18 1.2k 394 234 207 149 41 1.4k
Greg Trompeter United States 9 784 0.6× 371 0.9× 124 0.5× 169 0.8× 109 0.7× 16 1.0k
Jamie Pratt United States 14 1.2k 1.0× 383 1.0× 208 0.9× 234 1.1× 208 1.4× 33 1.3k
Neil Fargher Australia 19 1.5k 1.2× 554 1.4× 481 2.1× 151 0.7× 148 1.0× 68 1.7k
Donald R. Deis United States 11 993 0.8× 389 1.0× 152 0.6× 191 0.9× 101 0.7× 26 1.2k
Brant E. Christensen United States 15 1.0k 0.8× 302 0.8× 189 0.8× 229 1.1× 154 1.0× 45 1.2k
Audrey A. Gramling United States 17 1.1k 0.9× 313 0.8× 100 0.4× 310 1.5× 82 0.6× 41 1.2k
Karl E. Hackenbrack United States 13 906 0.7× 247 0.6× 191 0.8× 191 0.9× 128 0.9× 17 999
Lisa Milici Gaynor United States 14 914 0.7× 288 0.7× 136 0.6× 223 1.1× 78 0.5× 27 1.0k
Brian J. White United States 12 491 0.4× 322 0.8× 183 0.8× 87 0.4× 73 0.5× 44 745
Nicholas Seybert United States 13 772 0.6× 267 0.7× 323 1.4× 63 0.3× 119 0.8× 29 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Jaime J. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaime J. Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaime J. Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaime J. Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaime J. Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaime J. Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaime J. Schmidt. The network helps show where Jaime J. Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jaime J. Schmidt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jaime J. Schmidt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jaime J. Schmidt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jaime J. Schmidt. Jaime J. Schmidt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gaynor, Lisa Milici, et al.. (2025). A Multidisciplinary Theory Repository and Assurance Ecosystem Framework to Facilitate Research. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory. 45(1). 27–48. 1 indexed citations
2.
Drake, Katharine D., Nathan C. Goldman, Stephen J. Lusch, & Jaime J. Schmidt. (2023). Disclosure of tax‐related critical audit matters and tax‐related outcomes. Contemporary Accounting Research. 41(2). 719–747. 15 indexed citations
3.
Hallman, Nicholas, et al.. (2023). Does Initial-Year Audit Fee Discounting Occur and Impair Audit Quality?. SSRN Electronic Journal.
4.
Hallman, Nicholas, et al.. (2022). How do auditors respond to competition? Evidence from the bidding process. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 73(2-3). 101475–101475. 2 indexed citations
5.
Lennox, Clive S., Jaime J. Schmidt, & Anne Thompson. (2022). Why are expanded audit reports not informative to investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies. 28(2). 497–532. 118 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Hallman, Nicholas, et al.. (2020). Measuring Competitive Bidding in the Audit Market and Its Relation to Market Concentration, Audit Quality, and Audit Fees: Evidence from Auditor Views of Company SEC Filings. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
7.
Drake, Katharine D., Nathan C. Goldman, Stephen J. Lusch, & Jaime J. Schmidt. (2020). Have Critical Audit Matter Disclosures Indirectly Benefitted Investors by Constraining Earnings Management? Evidence from Tax Accounts. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations
8.
Schmidt, Jaime J., et al.. (2019). Do Type II Subsequent Events Impair Financial Reporting Quality?. The Accounting Review. 95(6). 97–123. 9 indexed citations
9.
Lawson, Bradley P., et al.. (2018). Does Audit Committee Reporting Need to Be Improved? Evidence from a Large-Scale Textual Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
10.
Kachelmeier, Steven J., Jaime J. Schmidt, & Kristen Valentine. (2017). The Disclaimer Effect of Disclosing Critical Audit Matters in the Auditorrs Report. SSRN Electronic Journal. 38 indexed citations
11.
Kachelmeier, Steven J., et al.. (2015). When Do Ineffective Audit Committee Members Experience Turnover?. Contemporary Accounting Research. 33(1). 228–260. 32 indexed citations
12.
Lennox, Clive S., Jaime J. Schmidt, & Anne Thompson. (2015). Is the Expanded Model of Audit Reporting Informative to Investors? Evidence from the UK. SSRN Electronic Journal. 70 indexed citations
13.
Keune, Marsha B., Brian W. Mayhew, & Jaime J. Schmidt. (2015). Non-Big 4 Local Market Leadership and its Effect on Competition. The Accounting Review. 91(3). 907–931. 43 indexed citations
14.
Schmidt, Jaime J., et al.. (2014). Does Auditor Explanatory Language in Unqualified Audit Reports Indicate Increased Financial Misstatement Risk?. The Accounting Review. 89(6). 2115–2149. 131 indexed citations
15.
Schmidt, Jaime J., et al.. (2013). Does Auditor 'Commentary' in Unqualified Audit Reports Reflect Financial Misstatement Risk?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15 indexed citations
16.
17.
Schmidt, Jaime J., et al.. (2012). Auditing the Audit Committee: A Study of Shareholders' and Boards' Efforts to Hold Audit Committee Members Accountable. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations
18.
Schmidt, Jaime J.. (2011). Perceived Auditor Independence and Audit Litigation: The Role of Nonaudit Services Fees. SSRN Electronic Journal. 41 indexed citations
19.
Myers, Linda A., Jaime J. Schmidt, & Michael S. Wilkins. (2011). An Investigation of Recent Changes in Going Concern Reporting Decisions Among Big N and Non-Big N Auditors. SSRN Electronic Journal. 17 indexed citations
20.
Schmidt, Jaime J., et al.. (2009). Beta-catenin is not activated by downregulation of PTEN in osteoblasts. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal. 45(7). 361–370. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026