C. Tong
-
- Diabetes Treatment and Management 2
- Family Practice top 10%
- Surgery top 10%
- Pancreatic function and diabetes 2
- Pharmacology top 5%
-
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills 4
-
- Reading and Literacy Development 3
-
- Nutrition and Health in Aging 3
-
- Mesenchymal stem cell research 2
-
- Frailty in Older Adults 2
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 2
- Co-authors
- Gary MeiningerWilliam CanovatchelKyung‐Ah KimWilliam T. CefaluKeith UsiskinMaria AlbaKaj StenlöfJaime A. Davidson
- Journals
- The journal of nutrition health & aging (3 papers)Reading and Writing (2 papers)Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Hong KongChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
C. Tong
11 papers receiving 923 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 877
- Family Practice 27
- Surgery 474
- Pharmacology 176
- Molecular Biology 327
Countries citing papers authored by C. Tong
This map shows the geographic impact of C. Tong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by C. Tong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites C. Tong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by C. Tong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by C. Tong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by C. Tong. The network helps show where C. Tong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside C. Tong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 13 | Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin compared with placebo and sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes on background metformin monotherapy: a randomised trialbreakdown → | 2013 | 406 |
| 14 | Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with diet and exercisebreakdown → | 2012 | 513 |
About C. Tong
C. Tong is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Statistics and Probability and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 961 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (3 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (3 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (2 papers) and Pancreatic function and diabetes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (877 citations), Family Practice (27 citations) and Surgery (474 citations). C. Tong has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gary Meininger, William Canovatchel, Kyung‐Ah Kim, William T. Cefalu, Keith Usiskin, Maria Alba, Kaj Stenlöf, Jaime A. Davidson, Fernando J. Lavalle‐González and Andrzej Januszewicz. Their work appears in journals such as The journal of nutrition health & aging, Reading and Writing, Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism, Diabetologia and Learning and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.