James F. Griffith

14.8k total citations
385 papers, 10.5k citations indexed

About

James F. Griffith is a scholar working on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Rheumatology. According to data from OpenAlex, James F. Griffith has authored 385 papers receiving a total of 10.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 195 papers in Surgery, 130 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and 102 papers in Rheumatology. Recurrent topics in James F. Griffith's work include Bone and Joint Diseases (82 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (57 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (42 papers). James F. Griffith is often cited by papers focused on Bone and Joint Diseases (82 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (57 papers) and Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (42 papers). James F. Griffith collaborates with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United States. James F. Griffith's co-authors include Ping‐Chung Leung, Gregory E. Antonio, Yì Wáng, Anil T. Ahuja, David K.W. Yeung, Jason Leung, Timothy Kwok, Jean Woo, S. M. Kumta and Alex W. H. Ng and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

James F. Griffith

369 papers receiving 10.2k citations

Peers

James F. Griffith
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
  • Surgery 4.7k
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 3.3k
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.7k
  • Rheumatology 1.7k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.6k
Replace Giuseppe Guglielmi with:
Giuseppe Guglielmi Italy
Klaus Engelke Germany
Shreyasee Amin United States
Heikki Kröger Finland
J. Dequeker Belgium
Thomas M. Link United States
Jon A. Jacobson United States
Anne Cotten France
Dominik Weishaupt Switzerland
Roland Chapurlat France
Giuseppe Guglielmi Italy View profile →
Citations per field, relative to James F. Griffith
James F. Griffith · 1×
Citations per year, relative to James F. Griffith
James F. Griffith · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by James F. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James F. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James F. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James F. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James F. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James F. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James F. Griffith. The network helps show where James F. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James F. Griffith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James F. Griffith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James F. Griffith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James F. Griffith. James F. Griffith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 2
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 2
6 2
7 1
8 2
9 4
10 5
11 5
12 12
13 15
14 14
15 9
16 26
17
The incidence of deep venous thrombosis in Chinese medical Intensive Care Unit patients.
13
18 147
19 61
20 23

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026