Renee Amori
About
In The Last Decade
Renee Amori
7 papers receiving 837 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 772
- Molecular Biology 306
- Surgery 296
- Pharmacology 157
- Oncology 150
Countries citing papers authored by Renee Amori
This map shows the geographic impact of Renee Amori's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renee Amori with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renee Amori more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Renee Amori
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renee Amori. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renee Amori. The network helps show where Renee Amori may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Renee Amori
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Renee Amori. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Renee Amori based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Renee Amori. Renee Amori is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Efficacy and safety of incretin therapy in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. breakdown → | 842 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.