Faith Ho

4.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
94 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Faith Ho is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Immunology. According to data from OpenAlex, Faith Ho has authored 94 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 35 papers in Oncology and 23 papers in Immunology. Recurrent topics in Faith Ho's work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (47 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (30 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (12 papers). Faith Ho is often cited by papers focused on Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (47 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (30 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (12 papers). Faith Ho collaborates with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and United States. Faith Ho's co-authors include D. Todd, S.L. Loke, Gopesh Srivastava, Raymond Liang, Shigeo Mori, Ih‐Jen Su, Glauco Frizzera, Elaine S. Jaffe, John K.C. Chan and Alfred C. Feller and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Faith Ho

90 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

Report of the Workshop on Nasal and Related Extranodal An... 1996 2026 2006 2016 1996 100 200 300 400 500

Peers

Faith Ho
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.9k
  • Oncology 1.8k
  • Immunology 1.1k
  • Neurology 390
  • Epidemiology 349
Replace Keisei Kawa with:
Keisei Kawa Japan
Carlos Montalbán Spain
Bruce Patterson Canada
Daina Variakojis United States
Thomas G. Gross United States
Naokuni Uike Japan
Fiona E. Craig United States
James A. Strauchen United States
Rachele Volpe Italy
Norbert Frickhofen Germany
Keisei Kawa Japan View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Faith Ho
Faith Ho · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Faith Ho
Faith Ho · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Faith Ho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Faith Ho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Faith Ho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Faith Ho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Faith Ho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Faith Ho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Faith Ho. The network helps show where Faith Ho may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Faith Ho

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Faith Ho. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Faith Ho based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Faith Ho. Faith Ho is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 0
5 2
6 2
7 3
8 18
9
Effectiveness of day care services for dementia patients and their caregivers
10
10 2
11 83
12
Report of the Workshop on Nasal and Related Extranodal Angiocentric T/Natural Killer Cell Lymphomas breakdown →
581
13 77
14 69
15 13
16 45
17 15
18 36
19 15
20
Abnormal distribution of O-alkyl groups in the neutral glycerolipids from human hepatocellular carcinomas.
21

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026