Bridget Conor

18 papers receiving 293 citations

Hit Papers

Gender and Creative Labour 2015 · 196 citations
1960+3+7Years since publication50100150

Peers

Bridget Conor
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Urban Studies 192
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 65
  • Gender Studies 98
  • Museology 31
  • Music 23
Replace Orian Brook with:
Orian Brook United Kingdom
Lauren England United Kingdom
Jen Harvie United Kingdom
Anita Zednik Australia
Pascal Gielen Belgium
Sara Selwood United Kingdom
Gene Ray United States
Eduardo de la Fuente Australia
Arnd Schneider United Kingdom
Barbara Jaffee United States
Bridget Conor relative to Orian Brook United Kingdom Orian Brook's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21×
Orian Brook · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bridget Conor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bridget Conor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bridget Conor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bridget Conor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bridget Conor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bridget Conor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bridget Conor. The network helps show where Bridget Conor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Bridget Conor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bridget Conor Line = papers co-authored together Bridget Conor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1
Gender and Creative Labour
Hit paper breakdown →
2015196
2 201429
3 202112
4 201011
5 201211
6 201410
7 20179
8 20198
9 20156
10
Hired hands, liars, schmucks: Histories of screenwriting work and workers in contemporary screen production
20135
11
Managing Creative Economies as Cultural Eco-Systems
20204
12 20163
13 20173
14
The Hobbit law: Precarity and market citizenship in cultural production
20152
15 20202
16 20191
17 20171
18
Gender and Creativity: Progress on the precipice
20211

About Bridget Conor

Bridget Conor is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Museology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (9 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (8 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (3 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (2 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper) and Digital Games and Media (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (192 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (65 citations), Gender Studies (98 citations), Museology (31 citations) and Music (23 citations). Bridget Conor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rosalind Gill, Stephanie Taylor, Roberta Comunian, Jonathan Gross, Craig Batty, Nick Wilson, Daniel Ashton, Sophie Bishop, Pekka Stenholm and Rebecca Saunders. Their work appears in journals such as The Sociological Review, Journal of Screenwriting, New Writing, Feminist Media Studies and Television & New Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact