Orian Brook

566 total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 264 citations indexed

About

Orian Brook is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Orian Brook has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 264 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Urban Studies, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Orian Brook's work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (8 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (3 papers). Orian Brook is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Industries and Urban Development (8 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (5 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (3 papers). Orian Brook collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Orian Brook's co-authors include Dave O’Brien, Mark Taylor and Andrew Miles and has published in prestigious journals such as Sociology, Sociological Research Online and European Journal of Cultural Studies.

In The Last Decade

Orian Brook

9 papers receiving 248 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Culture is bad for you

2020 120 citations Orian Brook, Dave O’Brien et al. Manchester University Press eBooks profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Orian Brook United Kingdom	8	158	147	33	31	31	10	264
Anita Zednik Australia	4	136 0.9×	74 0.5×	8 0.2×	40 1.3×	35 1.1×	10	223
Bridget Conor United Kingdom	8	192 1.2×	122 0.8×	98 3.0×	23 0.7×	65 2.1×	18	314
Jen Harvie United Kingdom	9	76 0.5×	109 0.7×	14 0.4×	19 0.6×	133 4.3×	23	288
Sara Selwood United Kingdom	8	196 1.2×	144 1.0×	12 0.4×	8 0.3×	73 2.4×	39	315
Gene Ray United States	7	57 0.4×	74 0.5×	10 0.3×	5 0.2×	40 1.3×	19	194
Rebecca D. Gill United States	7	85 0.5×	99 0.7×	151 4.6×	12 0.4×	10 0.3×	32	293
Ricardo Campos Portugal	10	162 1.0×	90 0.6×	16 0.5×	5 0.2×	13 0.4×	54	272
Modesto Gayo Chile	10	110 0.7×	219 1.5×	19 0.6×	69 2.2×	3 0.1×	26	311
Yannick Lemel France	8	97 0.6×	210 1.4×	15 0.5×	55 1.8×	3 0.1×	27	278
Jennifer L. Fleissner United States	7	8 0.1×	84 0.6×	37 1.1×	10 0.3×	24 0.8×	18	292

Countries citing papers authored by Orian Brook

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Orian Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Orian Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Orian Brook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Orian Brook

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Orian Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Orian Brook. The network helps show where Orian Brook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Orian Brook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Orian Brook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Orian Brook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Orian Brook. Orian Brook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Brook, Orian, Andrew Miles, Dave O’Brien, & Mark Taylor. (2022). Social Mobility and ‘Openness’ in Creative Occupations since the 1970s. Sociology. 57(4). 789–810. 7 indexed citations

2.

Brook, Orian, Dave O’Brien, & Mark Taylor. (2021). Culture is bad for you: Inequality in the cultural and creative industries. 21 indexed citations

3.

Brook, Orian, Dave O’Brien, & Mark Taylor. (2020). “There’s No Way That You Get Paid to Do the Arts”: Unpaid Labour Across the Cultural and Creative Life Course. Sociological Research Online. 25(4). 571–588. 22 indexed citations

4.

Brook, Orian, Dave O’Brien, & Mark Taylor. (2020). Culture is bad for you. Manchester University Press eBooks. 120 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Brook, Orian, Dave O’Brien, & Mark Taylor. (2019). Inequality talk: How discourses by senior men reinforce exclusions from creative occupations. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 24(2). 498–513. 15 indexed citations

6.

O’Brien, Dave, Orian Brook, & Mark Taylor. (2018). Panic! Social Class, Taste and Inequalities in the Creative Industries. 11 indexed citations

7.

Brook, Orian. (2016). Spatial equity and cultural participation: how access influences attendance at museums and galleries in London. Cultural Trends. 25(1). 21–34. 45 indexed citations

8.

Brook, Orian. (2013). Reframing models of arts attendance: Understanding the role of access to a venue. The case of opera in London. Cultural Trends. 22(2). 97–107. 17 indexed citations

9.

Brook, Orian. (2011). International comparisons of public engagement in culture and sport. 5 indexed citations

10.

Brook, Orian. (2007). Response 1. Cultural Trends. 16(4). 385–388. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact