Journal of Screenwriting

217 papers and 430 indexed citations

About

The 217 papers published in Journal of Screenwriting in the last decades have received a total of 430 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Screenwriting usually cover Visual Arts and Performing Arts (125 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (67 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (54 papers) specifically the topics of Artistic and Creative Research (104 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (54 papers) and Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (36 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Screenwriting are Craig Batty, Bridget Conor, Steven Price, Patrick Cattrysse, Eva Novrup Redvall, Monika Bednarek, Paul Wells, John R. Cook, P. N. Keating and Paolo Maria Russo.

In The Last Decade

Journal of Screenwriting

155 papers receiving 380 citations

Fields of papers published in Journal of Screenwriting

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Screenwriting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Screenwriting.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Screenwriting

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Screenwriting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Screenwriting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Screenwriting more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026