Television & New Media

916 papers and 10.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 916 papers published in Television & New Media in the last decades have received a total of 10.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Television & New Media usually cover Sociology and Political Science (385 papers), Communication (304 papers) and Gender Studies (284 papers) specifically the topics of Media Studies and Communication (237 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (230 papers) and Cinema and Media Studies (149 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Television & New Media are Nick Couldry, Ulises A. Mejias, Mark Andrejevic, Paola Ricaurte Quijano, Sarah Florini, José van Dijck, Silvio Waisbord, Christian Fuchs, Rebecca Lewis and John Corner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Television & New Media

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Television & New Media. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Television & New Media.

Countries where authors publish in Television & New Media

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Television & New Media. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Television & New Media with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Television & New Media more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025