Daniel Ashton

37 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Daniel Ashton
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Urban Studies 126
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 18
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 24
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 32
  • Education 90
Replace Stefan Meisiek with:
Stefan Meisiek Australia
Øystein Gilje Norway
Erika Sauer Finland
Katya Johanson Australia
Hilary Glow Australia
Ben Walmsley United Kingdom
Elizabeth Ellcessor United States
Johannes Fromme Germany
Lynda Kelly Australia
Harold Pearse
Daniel Ashton relative to Stefan Meisiek Australia Stefan Meisiek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Stefan Meisiek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Ashton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Ashton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Ashton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Ashton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Ashton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Ashton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Ashton. The network helps show where Daniel Ashton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Ashton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Ashton Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Ashton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201533
2 201328
3 200424
4 201121
5 201119
6 201314
7 201414
8 200913
9 201412
10 201012
11 200911
12
The professional in the age of the amateur: higher education and journalism on-the-job
20088
13
Debating High Skills and Joined-up Policy
20078
14 20117
15 20196
16 20216
17 20106
18 20106
19 20136
20 20185

About Daniel Ashton

Daniel Ashton is a scholar working on Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 38 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cultural Industries and Urban Development (17 papers), Digital Games and Media (10 papers), Higher Education and Employability (9 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (4 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (3 papers), Higher Education Governance and Development (3 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (3 papers) and Higher Education Practises and Engagement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (126 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (18 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (24 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (32 citations) and Education (90 citations). Daniel Ashton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alan L. Hudson, D.J. Nutt, Uwe Kitzinger, Rebecca Feasey, Seth Giddings, Hugh Lauder, André Kraak, Bridget Conor, Peter A. Brown and Dawn Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Education and Work, Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, European Journal of Cultural Studies, Information Technology and People and Education + Training.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact