Brian O'Shaughnessy

827 citations
13 papers · 319 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Brian O'Shaughnessy

13 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Brian O'Shaughnessy
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 113
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 165
  • History and Philosophy of Science 32
  • Philosophy 74
  • General Psychology 6
Replace James G. Taylor with:
James G. Taylor South Africa
Wayne Wu United States
Mark Miller United Kingdom
Dustin Stokes United States
Helena De Preester Belgium
Charles Lenay France
Anthony S. Barnhart United States
Robert F. Goldberg United States
Andrew Geeves Australia
Paula Rubio‐Fernández Norway
Brian O'Shaughnessy relative to James G. Taylor South Africa James G. Taylor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
James G. Taylor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian O'Shaughnessy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian O'Shaughnessy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian O'Shaughnessy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian O'Shaughnessy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian O'Shaughnessy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian O'Shaughnessy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian O'Shaughnessy. The network helps show where Brian O'Shaughnessy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Brian O'Shaughnessy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian O'Shaughnessy Line = papers co-authored together Brian O'Shaughnessy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 1989169
2 198668
3 200318
4 197012
5 197212
6 198911
7 19639
8 19916
9
Seeing the Light
19855
10 19904
11 19562
12 19852
13
The False Inventive Genus: Developing a New Approach for Analyzing the Sufficiency of Patent Disclosure Within the Unpredictable Arts
19961

About Brian O'Shaughnessy

Brian O'Shaughnessy is a scholar working on Philosophy, Management of Technology and Innovation, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 13 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intellectual Property and Patents (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (1 paper), Art History and Market Analysis (1 paper), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (165 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (32 citations), Philosophy (74 citations) and General Psychology (6 citations). Brian O'Shaughnessy has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Adam Morton, Sidney Morgenbesser, William Morris, Robert C. Richardson, Leo Zaibert, François Récanati, Kevin Mulligan, Barry Smith, Joëlle Proust and Fred Dretske. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Issues, Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact