Andrew Geeves

515 citations
13 papers · 269 indexed · h-index 6

Andrew Geeves

13 papers receiving 254 citations

Peers

Andrew Geeves
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Music 55
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 181
  • Social Psychology 143
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 46
Replace Marie Izaute with:
Marie Izaute France
Charlotte L. Doyle United States
Nicolas J. Bullot Australia
Mathilde Lamotte France
Melissa K. Jungers United States
Jiehui Hu China
Dee Reynolds United Kingdom
Marja-Leena Juntunen Finland
Frank M. Diaz United States
Darlene DeMarie United States
Andrew Geeves relative to Marie Izaute France Marie Izaute's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marie Izaute · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Geeves

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Geeves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Geeves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Geeves more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Geeves

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Geeves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Geeves. The network helps show where Andrew Geeves may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Geeves, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Geeves Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Geeves links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 20203
2 201857
3 20154
4 201513
5 20149
6 20149
7 201331
8 2011131
9 20103
10 20103
11
Investigating the reciprocity between body and performance for a professional musician
20091
12
Critical review of Chaffin, Imreh, and Crawford, Practicing Perfection: memory and piano performance.
20084
13 20081

About Andrew Geeves

Andrew Geeves is a scholar working on Music, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Rehabilitation, having authored 13 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Music Education Insights (7 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (7 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (2 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Flow Experience in Various Fields (1 paper) and Musicians’ Health and Performance (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (55 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (181 citations), Social Psychology (143 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (46 citations). Andrew Geeves has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include John Sutton, Doris McIlwain, Wayne Christensen, Kirk N. Olsen, William Forde Thompson, Alan Taylor and Jane W. Davidson. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Popular Media Culture, Educational Philosophy and Theory, Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience and Psychology of Music.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026