Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians
1981401 citationsSusan T. Sommer, William Morris et al.Notesprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by William Morris
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of William Morris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Morris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Morris more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Morris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Morris. The network helps show where William Morris may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William Morris
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William Morris.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William Morris based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with William Morris. William Morris is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Morris, William, et al.. (1996). William Morris on history.1 indexed citations
4.
Snee, Ronald D., William Morris, & William E. Smith. (1994). Interaction blending equations enhance reformulated gasoline profitability. Oil & gas journal.1 indexed citations
5.
Morris, William & Clive Wilmer. (1993). News from Nowhere : and Other Writings. Penguin Books.52 indexed citations
Morris, William, Robert C. Richardson, & Brian O'Shaughnessy. (1989). The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory.. Noûs. 23(5). 677–677.10 indexed citations
8.
Morris, William. (1986). Optimum blending gives best pool octane. Oil & gas journal.3 indexed citations
9.
DiNardo, Joseph C., et al.. (1985). A quantitative in vitro assay for the evaluation of phototoxic potential of topically applied materials. II. Modification and assessment of low level activity. 36(6). 425–433.2 indexed citations
Morris, William, et al.. (1983). Use of the rabbit ear model in evaluating the comedogenic potential of cosmetic ingredients. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists. 34(5). 215–225.9 indexed citations
12.
Sommer, Susan T., William Morris, Virgil Thomson, Michael Tilson Thomas, & Stanley Sadie. (1981). The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians. Notes. 38(1). 45–45.401 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Morris, William. (1975). A.L.A. planning process for public libraries, U.K. test.1 indexed citations
Morris, William & Fiona Clark. (1973). William Morris: wallpapers and chintzes. St Martin's Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
16.
Morris, William. (1973). The heritage illustrated dictionary of the English language. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).31 indexed citations
17.
Morris, William, et al.. (1973). Political writings of William Morris. Medical Entomology and Zoology.35 indexed citations
18.
Morris, William, et al.. (1962). Dictionary of word and phrase origins. Harper & Row eBooks.4 indexed citations
Morris, William, et al.. (1956). Words : the new illustrated dictionary.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.