Dustin Stokes

1.2k total citations
21 papers, 360 citations indexed

About

Dustin Stokes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Dustin Stokes has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 360 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Dustin Stokes's work include Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (6 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (5 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers). Dustin Stokes is often cited by papers focused on Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (6 papers), Embodied and Extended Cognition (5 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers). Dustin Stokes collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Dustin Stokes's co-authors include Trafton Drew, Jeanine K. Stefanucci, Megan K. Mills and Lace Padilla and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Consciousness and Cognition and Emotion Review.

In The Last Decade

Dustin Stokes

20 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

Dustin Stokes
John Schwenkler United States
Zoe Drayson United States
Amy Ione United States
Andrew Geeves Australia
Jane E. Cottrell United States
Dustin Stokes
Citations per year, relative to Dustin Stokes Dustin Stokes (= 1×) peers Margherita Arcangeli

Countries citing papers authored by Dustin Stokes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dustin Stokes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dustin Stokes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dustin Stokes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dustin Stokes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dustin Stokes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dustin Stokes. The network helps show where Dustin Stokes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dustin Stokes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dustin Stokes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dustin Stokes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dustin Stokes. Dustin Stokes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stefanucci, Jeanine K., et al.. (2023). Visual expertise is more than meets the eye: an examination of holistic visual processing in radiologists and architects. Journal of Medical Imaging. 10(1). 15501–15501. 4 indexed citations
2.
Padilla, Lace, et al.. (2021). Through the eyes of the expert: Evaluating holistic processing in architects through gaze-contingent viewing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 28(3). 870–878. 3 indexed citations
3.
Stokes, Dustin, et al.. (2021). Computer creativity is a matter of agency. 1 indexed citations
4.
Stokes, Dustin. (2021). Thinking and Perceiving. 8 indexed citations
5.
Stokes, Dustin. (2020). On perceptual expertise. Mind & Language. 36(2). 241–263. 12 indexed citations
6.
Stokes, Dustin. (2019). Memory, Imagery, and Self-Knowledge. 10(2). 2 indexed citations
7.
Stokes, Dustin. (2018). Rich Perceptual Content and Aesthetic Properties. Oxford University Press eBooks. 13 indexed citations
8.
Stokes, Dustin. (2018). Mental imagery and fiction. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 49(6). 731–754. 10 indexed citations
9.
Stokes, Dustin. (2017). Attention and the Cognitive Penetrability of Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 96(2). 303–318. 22 indexed citations
10.
Stokes, Dustin, et al.. (2016). Noise, uncertainty, and interest: Predictive coding and cognitive penetration. Consciousness and Cognition. 47. 86–98. 10 indexed citations
11.
Stokes, Dustin. (2016). Imagination and creativity. 267–281. 3 indexed citations
12.
Stokes, Dustin, et al.. (2015). Modular architectures and informational encapsulation: a dilemma. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 5(3). 315–338. 10 indexed citations
13.
Stefanucci, Jeanine K. & Dustin Stokes. (2015). Commentary on Balcetis: On Some Limits to the Motivational Direction Approach. Emotion Review. 8(2). 129–130.
14.
Stokes, Dustin. (2014). Cognitive Penetration and Perception of Art. dialectica. 68(1). 1–34. 45 indexed citations
15.
Stokes, Dustin. (2013). Cognitive Penetrability of Perception. Philosophy Compass. 8(7). 646–663. 95 indexed citations
16.
Stokes, Dustin. (2011). Minimally Creative Thought. Metaphilosophy. 42(5). 658–681. 18 indexed citations
17.
Stokes, Dustin. (2011). Perceiving and desiring: a new look at the cognitive penetrability of experience. Philosophical Studies. 158(3). 477–492. 66 indexed citations
18.
Stokes, Dustin. (2009). Aesthetics and Cognitive Science. Philosophy Compass. 4(5). 715–733. 10 indexed citations
19.
Stokes, Dustin. (2007). Incubated cognition and creativity. Figshare. 15 indexed citations
20.
Stokes, Dustin. (2006). The Evaluative Character of Imaginative Resistance. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 46(4). 387–405. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026