Brian Bishop

1.6k citations
26 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Brian Bishop

25 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Brian Bishop
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 350
  • Marketing 245
  • General Decision Sciences 48
  • Applied Psychology 121
  • Clinical Psychology 296
Replace Jennifer Boldero with:
Jennifer Boldero Australia
Renée J. Bator United States
Jack Arbuthnot United States
Stephen Wu United States
John Paul Schott United States
Cameron Brick Netherlands
Richard Osbaldiston United States
Daniela Caso Italy
Alexander Maki United States
Birga M. Schumpe United Arab Emirates
Brian Bishop relative to Jennifer Boldero Australia Jennifer Boldero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Jennifer Boldero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Brian Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Brian Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Brian Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian Bishop. The network helps show where Brian Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Brian Bishop, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Brian Bishop Line = papers co-authored together Brian Bishop links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2
Isthmoceles: A Growing Concern.
20232
3 20221
4 202019
5 201617
6 201616
7 201511
8 201486
9 2013365
10 201211
11 200980
12 20053
13 200455
14 20046
15 2003121
16 200323
17 200016
18 1999186
19 199516
20 19906

About Brian Bishop

Brian Bishop is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Safety Research, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (3 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers) and Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (350 citations), Marketing (245 citations), General Decision Sciences (48 citations), Applied Psychology (121 citations) and Clinical Psychology (296 citations). Brian Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Lucy Chan, Geoffrey J. Syme, Bradley S. Jorgensen, Robert Kane, Clare Roberts, Blair E. Nancarrow, Lynne D. Roberts, Bret Hart, Zoe Leviston and Jennifer Price. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Psychologist, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Economic Psychology, Clinical Infectious Diseases and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026