John Paul Schott

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 857 citations indexed

About

John Paul Schott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, John Paul Schott has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 857 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in John Paul Schott's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (3 papers). John Paul Schott is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers) and Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (3 papers). John Paul Schott collaborates with scholars based in United States. John Paul Schott's co-authors include Richard Osbaldiston, Alan J. Lambert, Laura D. Scherer, Fade R. Eadeh, Stephanie Allison Peak, Thomas C. O’Brien, Kristina R. Olson, Michael N. Jones, Tal Yarkoni and David A. Balota and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Current Directions in Psychological Science and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

John Paul Schott

8 papers receiving 808 citations

Hit Papers

Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Paul Schott United States 7 402 359 211 186 159 8 857
Linda J. Demaine United States 6 247 0.6× 344 1.0× 128 0.6× 137 0.7× 184 1.2× 12 807
Kelton Rhoads United States 6 276 0.7× 358 1.0× 173 0.8× 129 0.7× 194 1.2× 8 836
Jonas Rees Germany 14 507 1.3× 620 1.7× 178 0.8× 180 1.0× 213 1.3× 31 1.1k
Sonya Sachdeva United States 17 213 0.5× 611 1.7× 381 1.8× 170 0.9× 122 0.8× 41 1.5k
Cameron T. Whitley United States 14 237 0.6× 273 0.8× 147 0.7× 108 0.6× 35 0.2× 39 757
Kimin Eom Singapore 14 317 0.8× 407 1.1× 243 1.2× 121 0.7× 113 0.7× 27 710
Frans W. Siero Netherlands 16 402 1.0× 323 0.9× 174 0.8× 246 1.3× 193 1.2× 35 1.2k
Hoi‐Wing Chan Hong Kong 16 546 1.4× 497 1.4× 199 0.9× 274 1.5× 157 1.0× 34 1.0k
Birga M. Schumpe United Arab Emirates 14 153 0.4× 347 1.0× 241 1.1× 91 0.5× 128 0.8× 30 696
Blanca Fraijo-Sing Mexico 12 518 1.3× 249 0.7× 232 1.1× 266 1.4× 145 0.9× 38 997

Countries citing papers authored by John Paul Schott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Paul Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Paul Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Paul Schott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Paul Schott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Paul Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Paul Schott. The network helps show where John Paul Schott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Paul Schott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Paul Schott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Paul Schott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Paul Schott. John Paul Schott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Lambert, Alan J., et al.. (2014). Toward a greater understanding of the emotional dynamics of the mortality salience manipulation: Revisiting the “affect-free” claim of terror management research.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 106(5). 655–678. 105 indexed citations
2.
Lambert, Alan J., Stephanie Allison Peak, Fade R. Eadeh, & John Paul Schott. (2014). How do you feel now? On the perceptual distortion of extremely recent changes in anger. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 52. 82–95. 10 indexed citations
3.
Scherer, Laura D. & John Paul Schott. (2012). The Affect Misattribution Task Impacts Future Implicit and Explicit Judgments. Social Cognition. 30(5). 537–563. 6 indexed citations
4.
Osbaldiston, Richard & John Paul Schott. (2011). Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science. Environment and Behavior. 44(2). 257–299. 545 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Lambert, Alan J., John Paul Schott, & Laura D. Scherer. (2011). Threat, Politics, and Attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 20(6). 343–348. 60 indexed citations
6.
Schott, John Paul, Laura D. Scherer, & Alan J. Lambert. (2011). Casualties of war and sunk costs: Implications for attitude change and persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 47(6). 1134–1145. 9 indexed citations
7.
Holtzman, Nicholas S., John Paul Schott, Michael N. Jones, David A. Balota, & Tal Yarkoni. (2010). Exploring media bias with semantic analysis tools: validation of the Contrast Analysis of Semantic Similarity (CASS). Behavior Research Methods. 43(1). 193–200. 26 indexed citations
8.
Lambert, Alan J., et al.. (2010). Rally effects, threat, and attitude change: An integrative approach to understanding the role of emotion.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 98(6). 886–903. 96 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026