John Paul Schott
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Marketing top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cultural Differences and Values 3
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 3
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 6
- Media Influence and Politics 1
- Climate Change Communication and Perception 1
- Misinformation and Its Impacts 1
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2
-
- Computational and Text Analysis Methods 1
- Co-authors
- Richard OsbaldistonAlan J. LambertLaura D. SchererFade R. EadehStephanie Allison PeakThomas C. O’BrienKristina R. OlsonMichael N. Jones
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2 papers)Current Directions in Psychological Science (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
John Paul Schott
8 papers receiving 808 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 402
- Applied Psychology 159
- Marketing 186
- Social Psychology 211
- General Decision Sciences 16
Countries citing papers authored by John Paul Schott
This map shows the geographic impact of John Paul Schott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Paul Schott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Paul Schott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John Paul Schott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Paul Schott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Paul Schott. The network helps show where John Paul Schott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside John Paul Schott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 105 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 4 | Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Sciencebreakdown → | 2011 | 545 |
| 5 | 2011 | 60 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 96 |
About John Paul Schott
John Paul Schott is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, General Social Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 857 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Computational and Text Analysis Methods (1 paper), Media Influence and Politics (1 paper), Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper) and Misinformation and Its Impacts (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (402 citations), Applied Psychology (159 citations) and Marketing (186 citations). John Paul Schott has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Osbaldiston, Alan J. Lambert, Laura D. Scherer, Fade R. Eadeh, Stephanie Allison Peak, Thomas C. O’Brien, Kristina R. Olson, Michael N. Jones, Tal Yarkoni and David A. Balota. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Current Directions in Psychological Science and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.