Countries where authors publish in Australian Psychologist
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian Psychologist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian Psychologist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian Psychologist more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Australian Psychologist
This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian Psychologist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian Psychologist.
About Australian Psychologist
The 1.8k papers published in Australian Psychologist in the last decades have received a total of 27.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Australian Psychologist usually cover General Psychology (184 papers), Clinical Psychology (719 papers) and Applied Psychology (157 papers) specifically the topics of Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (184 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (176 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (157 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (143 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (111 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (99 papers), Community Health and Development (74 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (74 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian Psychologist are Helen M. Stallman, Wilmar B. Schaufeli, David Mellor, John J. Ray, Sidney Dekker, F. D. Naylor, Leon Mann, Piers Steel, Katrin B. Klingsieck and Andrew J. Martin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.