Bram Boris Van Acker

420 citations
12 papers · 273 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Bram Boris Van Acker

11 papers receiving 268 citations

Peers

Bram Boris Van Acker
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Human-Computer Interaction 41
  • Social Psychology 134
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 22
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 31
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 60
Replace Dan Nathan-Roberts with:
Dan Nathan-Roberts United States
Grant S. Taylor United States
Eileen Roesler Germany
Anja Naumann Germany
Tracy Sanders United States
Katelyn Procci United States
Justin Fidock Australia
Benedikt Leichtmann Germany
Setia Hermawati United Kingdom
Gabriella M. Hancock United States
Bram Boris Van Acker relative to Dan Nathan-Roberts United States Dan Nathan-Roberts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Dan Nathan-Roberts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bram Boris Van Acker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bram Boris Van Acker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bram Boris Van Acker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bram Boris Van Acker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bram Boris Van Acker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bram Boris Van Acker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bram Boris Van Acker. The network helps show where Bram Boris Van Acker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Bram Boris Van Acker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bram Boris Van Acker Line = papers co-authored together Bram Boris Van Acker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 202083
2 201875
3 201927
4 202218
5 201917
6 202016
7 202012
8 201611
9 20197
10 20206
11 20191
12 20210

About Bram Boris Van Acker

Bram Boris Van Acker is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 12 papers that have together received 273 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers), Design Education and Practice (3 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (41 citations), Social Psychology (134 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (22 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (31 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (60 citations). Bram Boris Van Acker has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jelle Saldien, Peter Vlerick, Klaas Bombeke, Pieter Vanneste, Annelies Raes, Charlotte Larmuseau, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Fien Depaepe, Peter Conradie and Jan Detand. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition Technology & Work, International Journal of Technology and Design Education, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Applied Ergonomics and Ergonomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact