Dan Nathan-Roberts
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dan Nathan-Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dan Nathan-Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dan Nathan-Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dan Nathan-Roberts. Dan Nathan-Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dan Nathan-Roberts
47 papers receiving 267 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Dan Nathan-Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dan Nathan-Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dan Nathan-Roberts. The network helps show where Dan Nathan-Roberts may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Dan Nathan-Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of Dan Nathan-Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dan Nathan-Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dan Nathan-Roberts more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.