Wouter Durnez

493 total citations
21 papers, 246 citations indexed

About

Wouter Durnez is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Wouter Durnez has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 246 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Wouter Durnez's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers). Wouter Durnez is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (5 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (4 papers). Wouter Durnez collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Germany. Wouter Durnez's co-authors include Stefaan Van Damme, Geert Crombez, Lieven De Marez, Mariek Vanden Abeele, Jakob Ohme, Klaas Bombeke, Jelle Saldien, Bram Boris Van Acker, Peter Vlerick and J. Mateus and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Pain and Cognition & Emotion.

In The Last Decade

Wouter Durnez

20 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Wouter Durnez Belgium 9 89 61 51 43 35 21 246
Anya Ragnhildstveit United States 8 54 0.6× 41 0.7× 23 0.5× 22 0.5× 41 1.2× 22 230
Yang S. Liu Canada 11 75 0.8× 19 0.3× 26 0.5× 46 1.1× 73 2.1× 41 317
Selen Razón United States 11 75 0.8× 13 0.2× 22 0.4× 134 3.1× 45 1.3× 43 407
Clairy Wiholm Sweden 10 33 0.4× 32 0.5× 63 1.2× 153 3.6× 48 1.4× 13 405
Clelia Malighetti Italy 11 53 0.6× 18 0.3× 53 1.0× 84 2.0× 36 1.0× 21 355
Philip A. Fine United Kingdom 10 141 1.6× 36 0.6× 26 0.5× 53 1.2× 74 2.1× 14 304
Michael Philipp New Zealand 10 33 0.4× 10 0.2× 43 0.8× 52 1.2× 32 0.9× 24 228
Shweta Ware United States 7 41 0.5× 11 0.2× 64 1.3× 59 1.4× 224 6.4× 11 315
Sarah Isherwood United Kingdom 9 116 1.3× 41 0.7× 7 0.1× 159 3.7× 66 1.9× 11 320
Daniel Finnegan United Kingdom 9 42 0.5× 5 0.1× 43 0.8× 50 1.2× 16 0.5× 29 285

Countries citing papers authored by Wouter Durnez

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Wouter Durnez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wouter Durnez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wouter Durnez more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Wouter Durnez

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wouter Durnez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wouter Durnez. The network helps show where Wouter Durnez may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wouter Durnez

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wouter Durnez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wouter Durnez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wouter Durnez. Wouter Durnez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wallendael, Glenn Van, Durk Talsma, Jelle Saldien, et al.. (2023). I spy with my AI: The effects of AI-based visual cueing on human operators’ performance and cognitive load in CCTV control rooms. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 95. 103444–103444. 4 indexed citations
2.
Durnez, Wouter, et al.. (2023). CaliBrainVR: Using Psycho-physiological Measures to Calibrate Virtual Reality Training. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 123–126. 3 indexed citations
4.
Acker, Bram Boris Van, Wouter Durnez, Pieter Vanneste, et al.. (2022). Danger, high voltage! Using EEG and EOG measurements for cognitive overload detection in a simulated industrial context. Applied Ergonomics. 102. 103763–103763. 18 indexed citations
5.
Cracco, Emiel, et al.. (2022). Evidence for a two-step model of social group influence. iScience. 25(9). 104891–104891. 8 indexed citations
6.
Bombeke, Klaas, et al.. (2022). ExperienceDNA: A Framework to Conduct and Analyse User Tests in VR. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research).
7.
Durnez, Wouter, Mark Claypool, Mathias Maes, et al.. (2021). Spaz!The Effects of Local Latency on Player Actions in a Desktop-Based Exergame. IEEE Transactions on Games. 14(4). 623–631. 2 indexed citations
8.
Hudders, Liselot, et al.. (2021). To Fit In or to Stand out? An Eye-Tracking Study Investigating Online Banner Effectiveness in a Media Multitasking Context. Journal of Advertising. 50(4). 461–478. 10 indexed citations
9.
Maes, Mathias, et al.. (2021). What did you expect?. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 6(1). 2 indexed citations
11.
Aelterman, Jan, Glenn Van Wallendael, Peter Lambert, et al.. (2020). An experimental study on the perceived quality of natively graded versus inverse tone mapped high dynamic range video content on television. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 80(4). 5559–5576. 3 indexed citations
12.
Durnez, Wouter, et al.. (2020). Seeing is Believing: The Effect of Video Quality on Quality of Experience in Virtual Reality. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 1–4. 6 indexed citations
13.
Acker, Bram Boris Van, Klaas Bombeke, Wouter Durnez, et al.. (2019). Mobile pupillometry in manual assembly: A pilot study exploring the wearability and external validity of a renowned mental workload lab measure. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 75. 102891–102891. 27 indexed citations
14.
Durnez, Wouter & Stefaan Van Damme. (2016). No Evidence for Threat-Induced Spatial Prioritization of Somatosensory Stimulation during Pain Control Using a Synchrony Judgment Paradigm. PLoS ONE. 11(6). e0156648–e0156648. 2 indexed citations
15.
Crombez, Geert, et al.. (2015). Is attentional prioritization on a location where pain is expected modality-specific or multisensory?. Consciousness and Cognition. 36. 246–255. 15 indexed citations
16.
Durnez, Wouter & Stefaan Van Damme. (2015). Let it be? Pain control attempts critically amplify attention to somatosensory input. Psychological Research. 81(1). 309–320. 9 indexed citations
17.
Durnez, Wouter, et al.. (2015). Detection of Tactile Change on a Bodily Location Where Pain is Expected. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 120(1). 219–231. 7 indexed citations
18.
Durnez, Wouter & Stefaan Van Damme. (2014). Trying to Fix a Painful Problem: The Impact of Pain Control Attempts on the Attentional Prioritization of a Threatened Body Location. Journal of Pain. 16(2). 135–143. 20 indexed citations
19.
Damme, Stefaan Van, et al.. (2013). The anticipation of pain at a specific location of the body prioritizes tactile stimuli at that location. Pain. 154(8). 1464–1468. 39 indexed citations
20.
Notebaert, Lies, Geert Crombez, Stefaan Van Damme, Wouter Durnez, & Jan Theeuwes. (2012). Attentional prioritisation of threatening information: Examining the role of the size of the attentional window. Cognition & Emotion. 27(4). 621–631. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026