Boris Pushkarev
- Transportation top 1%
- Building and Construction top 5%
- Ocean Engineering top 5%
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 5%
- Automotive Engineering top 10%
- Topics
- Transportation Planning and Optimization (4 papers)Urban Transport and Accessibility (3 papers)Transport and Economic Policies (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Boris Pushkarev
15 papers receiving 464 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Transportation 462
- Building and Construction 184
- Ocean Engineering 103
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 98
- Automotive Engineering 80
Countries citing papers authored by Boris Pushkarev
This map shows the geographic impact of Boris Pushkarev's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Boris Pushkarev with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Boris Pushkarev more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Boris Pushkarev
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Boris Pushkarev. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Boris Pushkarev. The network helps show where Boris Pushkarev may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Boris Pushkarev
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Boris Pushkarev. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Boris Pushkarev based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Boris Pushkarev. Boris Pushkarev is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Urban rail in America: An exploration of criteria for fixed-guideway transit | 56 |
| 2 | WHERE EXPRESS BUSES WORK | 1 |
| 3 | POWER FOR THE MTA: AN EXAMINATION OF FUTURE RIDERSHIP SERVICE, AND ELECTRIC POWER REQUIREMENTS FOR METROPLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY FACILITIES. | 1 |
| 4 | Public Transportation and Land Use Policy | 246 |
| 5 | URBAN DENSITIES FOR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | 10 |
| 6 | CAPACITY OF WALKWAYS | 32 |
| 7 | URBAN SPACE FOR PEDESTRIANS | 129 |
| 8 | Urban space for pedestrians : a report of the Regional Plan Association | 43 |
| 9 | How to save urban America : Regional Plan Association, Choices for '76 | 1 |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL DEMAND | 44 |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | Man-made America: Chaos or Control? An Inquiry into Selected Problems of Design in the Urbanized Landscape | 12 |
| 16 | ESTHETIC CRITERIA IN FREEWAY DESIGN | 1 |
About Boris Pushkarev
Boris Pushkarev is a scholar working on Transportation, Strategy and Management and Urban Studies, having authored 16 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transportation Planning and Optimization (4 papers), Urban Transport and Accessibility (3 papers) and Transport and Economic Policies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transportation (462 citations), Building and Construction (184 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (98 citations). Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey M Zupan, Carl W. Condit, John Delafons and William B. Shore. Their work appears in journals such as Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Technology and Culture and Harvard Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.