Bonnie Hagerty
- Co-authors
- Reg Arthur WilliamsJudith Lynch-SauerCynthia Arslanian‐EngorenJoan S. StarkKim A. EagleMalcolm A. LowtherMark WalshAndrew J. Medvecz
- Topics
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers)Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological ReportsThe Journal of the American Board of Family MedicineJournal of Nursing Education
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Bonnie Hagerty
18 papers receiving 332 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Clinical Psychology 97
- General Health Professions 86
- Social Psychology 81
- Pharmacology 67
- Education 44
Countries citing papers authored by Bonnie Hagerty
This map shows the geographic impact of Bonnie Hagerty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bonnie Hagerty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bonnie Hagerty more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bonnie Hagerty
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bonnie Hagerty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bonnie Hagerty. The network helps show where Bonnie Hagerty may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bonnie Hagerty
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bonnie Hagerty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bonnie Hagerty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bonnie Hagerty. Bonnie Hagerty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 24 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 74 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | Depression research in nursing : global perspectives | 4 |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 109 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | Putting master's programs to the test. | 2 |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | A second look at mentors. | 41 |
| 17 | Responsive Professional Education: Balancing Outcomes and Opportunities | 29 |
| 18 | Psychiatric-mental health assessment | 3 |
| 19 | 1 |
About Bonnie Hagerty
Bonnie Hagerty is a scholar working on Leadership and Management, Research and Theory and Applied Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (33 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (11 citations) and Toxicology (20 citations). Bonnie Hagerty has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Reg Arthur Williams, Judith Lynch-Sauer, Cynthia Arslanian‐Engoren, Joan S. Stark, Kim A. Eagle, Malcolm A. Lowther, Mark Walsh, Andrew J. Medvecz, Aakash Chauhan and M. Monahan. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Reports, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine and Journal of Nursing Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.