Shaké Ketefian

1.5k total citations
51 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Shaké Ketefian is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Issues, ethics and legal aspects. According to data from OpenAlex, Shaké Ketefian has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 5 papers in Issues, ethics and legal aspects. Recurrent topics in Shaké Ketefian's work include Ethics in medical practice (13 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (9 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers). Shaké Ketefian is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (13 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (9 papers) and Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers). Shaké Ketefian collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Thailand. Shaké Ketefian's co-authors include Richard W. Redman, Huey‐Ming Tzeng, Wipada Kunaviktikul, Milisa Manojlovich, Hugh McKenna, Elizabeth R. Lenz, Wichit Srisuphan, John Daly, Esther Chang and Patricia M. Davidson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Journal of Clinical Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Shaké Ketefian

50 papers receiving 992 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Shaké Ketefian United States	19	757	358	141	123	120	51	1.1k
María Auxiliadora Trevizan Brazil	18	554 0.7×	199 0.6×	121 0.9×	41 0.3×	83 0.7×	143	1.2k
Kath M. Melia United Kingdom	16	452 0.6×	236 0.7×	178 1.3×	182 1.5×	52 0.4×	48	1.0k
Isabel Cristina Kowal Olm Cunha Brazil	20	710 0.9×	150 0.4×	155 1.1×	67 0.5×	117 1.0×	186	1.3k
Letícia de Lima Trindade Brazil	20	788 1.0×	189 0.5×	175 1.2×	52 0.4×	47 0.4×	199	1.3k
Lori Candela United States	15	450 0.6×	186 0.5×	104 0.7×	305 2.5×	50 0.4×	39	1.0k
Arja Häggman‐Laitila Finland	19	748 1.0×	233 0.7×	268 1.9×	162 1.3×	159 1.3×	93	1.3k
Linda O’Mara Canada	18	790 1.0×	264 0.7×	219 1.6×	119 1.0×	28 0.2×	28	1.5k
José Luís Guedes dos Santos Brazil	19	687 0.9×	262 0.7×	129 0.9×	28 0.2×	89 0.7×	215	1.4k
Rose O. Sherman United States	18	779 1.0×	185 0.5×	214 1.5×	557 4.5×	120 1.0×	80	1.4k
Shwu‐Ru Liou Taiwan	22	344 0.5×	375 1.0×	127 0.9×	166 1.3×	60 0.5×	39	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Shaké Ketefian

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shaké Ketefian's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shaké Ketefian with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shaké Ketefian more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shaké Ketefian

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shaké Ketefian. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shaké Ketefian. The network helps show where Shaké Ketefian may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shaké Ketefian

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shaké Ketefian. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shaké Ketefian based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shaké Ketefian. Shaké Ketefian is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kim, Mi Ja, Hugh McKenna, Chang Gi Park, et al.. (2020). Global assessment instrument for quality of nursing doctoral education with a research focus: Validity and reliability study. Nurse Education Today. 91. 104475–104475. 13 indexed citations

Kim, Mi Ja, Chang Gi Park, So Hyun Park, Shahnaz Khan, & Shaké Ketefian. (2014). Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education and Scholarly Performance in U.S. Schools of Nursing: Strategic Areas for Improvement. Journal of Professional Nursing. 30(1). 10–18. 21 indexed citations

Ketefian, Shaké. (2013). Doctoral Nursing Education in Asia; Current Challenges and Future Directions: A Synthesis. 31(1). 25–40. 1 indexed citations

Ketefian, Shaké, et al.. (2010). Environments for nursing scholarship and journal impact factor in five countries. International Nursing Review. 57(3). 343–351. 9 indexed citations

McKenna, Hugh, et al.. (2006). Global quality criteria, standards, and indicators for doctoral programs in nursing; literature review and guideline development. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 43(4). 477–489. 57 indexed citations

Williams, Reg Arthur, Bonnie Hagerty, & Shaké Ketefian. (2005). Depression research in nursing : global perspectives. Springer eBooks. 4 indexed citations

Ketefian, Shaké, Patricia M. Davidson, John Daly, Esther Chang, & Wichit Srisuphan. (2005). Issues and challenges in international doctoral education in nursing. Nursing and Health Sciences. 7(3). 150–156. 50 indexed citations

Tzeng, Huey‐Ming & Shaké Ketefian. (2003). Demand for nursing competencies: an exploratory study in Taiwan's hospital system. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 12(4). 509–518. 22 indexed citations

Ketefian, Shaké. (2002). Culture Care Diversity and Universality: A Theory of Nursing. Nursing Education Perspectives. 23(1). 35. 54 indexed citations

10.

Ketefian, Shaké, et al.. (2001). The development of advanced practice roles: implications in the international nursing community. International Nursing Review. 48(3). 152–163. 48 indexed citations

11.

Ketefian, Shaké. (2001). Quality assessment of doctoral programmes. Health SA Gesondheid. 6(2). 46–54. 3 indexed citations

12.

Ketefian, Shaké. (2000). Legal and ethical issues: Ethical considerations in international nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing. 16(5). 257–257. 6 indexed citations

13.

Ketefian, Shaké. (2000). Ethical Concerns in International Nursing Research. International Journal of Nursing Practice. 6(6). 354–354. 2 indexed citations

14.

Ketefian, Shaké, et al.. (2000). Diversity in nursing education—Part III. Journal of Professional Nursing. 16(3). 129–129. 4 indexed citations

15.

Ketefian, Shaké. (1999). Knowing good and doing good—Is there a difference?. Journal of Professional Nursing. 15(1). 4–4. 1 indexed citations

16.

Ketefian, Shaké & Richard W. Redman. (1997). Nursing Science in the Global Community. Image the Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 29(1). 11–15. 37 indexed citations

17.

Hinshaw, Ada Sue & Shaké Ketefian. (1996). A missing research tradition. Journal of Professional Nursing. 12(4). 196–196. 1 indexed citations

18.

Lenz, Elizabeth R. & Shaké Ketefian. (1995). Promoting scientific integrity in nursing research part I: Current approaches in doctoral programs. Journal of Professional Nursing. 11(4). 213–219. 13 indexed citations

19.

Ketefian, Shaké. (1993). Essentials of doctoral education: Organization of program around knowledge areas. Journal of Professional Nursing. 9(5). 255–261. 15 indexed citations

20.

Ketefian, Shaké. (1991). Doctoral preparation for faculty roles: Expectations and realities. Journal of Professional Nursing. 7(2). 105–111. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact