Stephen Strobbe

35 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers

Stephen Strobbe
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 145
  • Research and Theory 10
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 61
  • Clinical Psychology 163
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 141
Replace Jennifer J. Bortz with:
Jennifer J. Bortz United States
Bernadette Winklbaur Austria
Joshua B. B. Garfield Australia
Thomas Kosten United States
C. McWilliam United Kingdom
David M. McDowell United States
Randy S. Burke United States
Alan J. Romanoski United States
David Eddie United States
Wendy Wickes Australia
Stephen Strobbe relative to Jennifer J. Bortz United States Jennifer J. Bortz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Jennifer J. Bortz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Strobbe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Strobbe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Strobbe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Strobbe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Strobbe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Strobbe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Strobbe. The network helps show where Stephen Strobbe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Strobbe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Strobbe Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Strobbe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008125
2 200895
3 200995
4 200670
5 201250
6 201144
7 201732
8 201427
9 201723
10 201821
11 201220
12 201215
13 201414
14 200713
15 201313
16 202112
17 201311
18 20199
19 20119
20 20139

About Stephen Strobbe

Stephen Strobbe is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pharmacology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 758 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (19 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (13 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (7 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (7 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (4 papers), Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency (4 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (4 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (145 citations), Research and Theory (10 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (163 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (141 citations). Stephen Strobbe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Kirk J. Brower, Flavia B. Consens, Marcin Wojnar, Mark A. Ilgen, Maher Karam‐Hage, Robert A. Zucker, Hyungjin Myra Kim, Anna Klimkiewicz, Jennifer M. Glass and Ernest Kurtz. Their work appears in journals such as Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, Pain Management Nursing, American Journal on Addictions, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact