Bing Li

6.3k citations
164 papers · 5.3k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 45

Bing Li

156 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Hit Papers

Food amyloid fibrils are safe nutrition ingredients ...89202120262022202450100150200

Peers

Bing Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Food Science 1.3k
  • Endocrinology 365
  • Molecular Medicine 285
  • Clinical Biochemistry 383
  • Biotechnology 465
Replace Kai Hilpert with:
Kai Hilpert Germany
Rosa Lanzetta Italy
Anabela Borges Portugal
Zhenbo Xu China
Supayang Piyawan Voravuthikunchai Thailand
Kamel Chaieb Tunisia
Jennifer M. Andrews United Kingdom
Xiaodong Xia China
Irith Wiegand Canada
Noorjahan Banu Alitheen Malaysia
Bing Li relative to Kai Hilpert Germany Kai Hilpert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Kai Hilpert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bing Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bing Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bing Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bing Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bing Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bing Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bing Li. The network helps show where Bing Li may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bing Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bing Li Line = papers co-authored together Bing Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20253
2 20250
3 20250
4 20251
5 20250
6 20250
7
Food amyloid fibrils are safe nutrition ingredients based on in-vitro and in-vivo assessmentbreakdown →
202389
8 20230
9 20228
10 202212
11 20228
12 202114
13 20204
14 202038
15 2019135
16 201817
17
Effect of inulin supplementation in the lactation period on the performance of piglets
20171
18 201716
19
Effects of Arecoline Hydrobromide on Taeniasis and Cysticercosis in Domestic Animals
20101
20
Study on the removal of protein in the polysaccharides from Morinda officinalis how
20051

About Bing Li

Bing Li is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Food Science, Biotechnology, Organic Chemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 164 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Proteins in Food Systems (21 papers), Advanced Glycation End Products research (15 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (11 papers), Food composition and properties (10 papers), Food Chemistry and Fat Analysis (10 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (8 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (7 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (1.3k citations), Endocrinology (365 citations), Molecular Medicine (285 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (383 citations) and Biotechnology (465 citations). Bing Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Zhenbo Xu, Lin Li, Brian M. Peters, Dingqiang Chen, Mark E. Shirtliff, Junyan Liu, Yang Deng, Lai‐Xi Wang, Xia Zhang and Lin Li. Their work appears in journals such as Microbial Pathogenesis, Food Chemistry, LWT, Molecules and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026