Bianca De Wit

11 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Bianca De Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 215
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 73
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 59
  • Social Psychology 27
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 20
Replace Stefan M. Wierda with:
Stefan M. Wierda Netherlands
Antoine Pasquali Belgium
Krishna Prasad Miyapuram India
Jenni Deveau United States
Herbert Hagendorf Germany
Brandi Lee Drisdelle Canada
Stefania D’Ascenzo Italy
Áine Ní Choisdealbha United Kingdom
Toshiya Miyatsu United States
Richard Plant United Kingdom
Bianca De Wit relative to Stefan M. Wierda Netherlands Stefan M. Wierda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Stefan M. Wierda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bianca De Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bianca De Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bianca De Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bianca De Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bianca De Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bianca De Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bianca De Wit. The network helps show where Bianca De Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bianca De Wit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bianca De Wit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bianca De Wit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bianca De Wit. Bianca De Wit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 2
4 1
5 55
6 7
7
Neurogaming Technology Meets Neuroscience Education: A Cost-Effective, Scalable, and Highly Portable Undergraduate Teaching Laboratory for Neuroscience.
8
8 42
9
The use of wearable technologies in Australian universities: examples from environmental science, cognitive and brain sciences and teacher training
11
10 99
11 15
12 15
13 32

About Bianca De Wit

Bianca De Wit is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (6 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (215 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (73 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (59 citations). Bianca De Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Sachiko Kinoshita, Nicholas A. Badcock, Genevieve McArthur, Dennis Norris, Johnson Thie, Nora Fieder, Nikolas Williams, Sue Gregory, Matt Bower and Sara de Freitas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Memory & Cognition and Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026