David M. Kaplan
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.1%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Co-authors
- Carl F. CraverColin KleinJ. Brendan RitchieDonald G. LangsleyRichard S. CriddleFrank S. PittmanRobert C. SmithArthur T. Rosenfield
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers)Action Observation and Synchronization (8 papers)
- Journals
- Physiological ReviewsSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
David M. Kaplan
75 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 180
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 700
- Cognitive Neuroscience 634
- History and Philosophy of Science 583
- Philosophy 497
- Artificial Intelligence 353
Countries citing papers authored by David M. Kaplan
This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Kaplan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Kaplan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Kaplan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Kaplan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Kaplan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Kaplan. The network helps show where David M. Kaplan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David M. Kaplan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David M. Kaplan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David M. Kaplan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David M. Kaplan. David M. Kaplan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | Noise, Statistics and Sign Problems | 0 |
| 16 | 57 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | A Validity Study of the Subjective Unit of Discomfort (SUD) Score. | 46 |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Foundations of Intensional Logic | 21 |
About David M. Kaplan
David M. Kaplan is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy, having authored 84 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (583 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (700 citations) and Philosophy (497 citations). David M. Kaplan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Carl F. Craver, Colin Klein, J. Brendan Ritchie, Donald G. Langsley, Richard S. Criddle, Frank S. Pittman, Robert C. Smith, Arthur T. Rosenfield, Lawrence H. Snyder and Gaurav H. Patel. Their work appears in journals such as Physiological Reviews, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.