Beth Singler

521 total citations
13 papers, 227 citations indexed

About

Beth Singler is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Beth Singler has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 227 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Philosophy, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Beth Singler's work include Media, Religion, Digital Communication (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers). Beth Singler is often cited by papers focused on Media, Religion, Digital Communication (5 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers). Beth Singler collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Beth Singler's co-authors include Claire Craig, Stephen Cave, Kanta Dihal and Eileen Barker and has published in prestigious journals such as AI & Society, Religions and Zygon®.

In The Last Decade

Beth Singler

12 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Beth Singler United Kingdom	7	88	82	51	44	27	13	227
Carl Öhman United Kingdom	8	65 0.7×	100 1.2×	22 0.4×	35 0.8×	55 2.0×	19	293
Mitch Parsell Australia	9	29 0.3×	63 0.8×	27 0.5×	13 0.3×	16 0.6×	18	270
Emmanuel Trouche France	8	30 0.3×	62 0.8×	44 0.9×	24 0.5×	27 1.0×	15	201
Caroline Bassett United Kingdom	7	16 0.2×	63 0.8×	12 0.2×	8 0.2×	18 0.7×	24	165
Donna Lanclos United Kingdom	9	24 0.3×	67 0.8×	9 0.2×	6 0.1×	19 0.7×	23	249
Kaarlo Miller Finland	4	38 0.4×	89 1.1×	71 1.4×	61 1.4×	45 1.7×	9	245
Michel Croce Italy	9	12 0.1×	95 1.2×	41 0.8×	105 2.4×	22 0.8×	24	221
Hale Ilgaz Türkiye	8	16 0.2×	49 0.6×	7 0.1×	34 0.8×	15 0.6×	23	332
Killian Lorcan McLoughlin United States	6	21 0.2×	187 2.3×	55 1.1×	4 0.1×	48 1.8×	8	284
Sarah W. Beck United States	13	19 0.2×	42 0.5×	13 0.3×	6 0.1×	8 0.3×	34	399

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Singler

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Singler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Singler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Singler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Singler

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Singler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Singler. The network helps show where Beth Singler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Beth Singler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Beth Singler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Beth Singler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Beth Singler. Beth Singler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Singler, Beth. (2023). “Will AI Create A Religion?”: Views of the Algorithmic Forms of the Religious Life in Popular Discourse. Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich). 5(1). 95–103. 6 indexed citations

2.

Singler, Beth. (2023). AI GODS, JEANS GODS, AND THRIFT GODS. Debates do NER. 141–155.

3.

Singler, Beth & Eileen Barker. (2021). Radical Transformations in Minority Religions. 2 indexed citations

4.

Singler, Beth. (2020). “Blessed by the algorithm”: Theistic conceptions of artificial intelligence in online discourse. AI & Society. 35(4). 945–955. 47 indexed citations

5.

Singler, Beth. (2020). The AI Creation Meme: A Case Study of the New Visibility of Religion in Artificial Intelligence Discourse. Religions. 11(5). 253–253. 25 indexed citations

6.

Singler, Beth. (2019). EXISTENTIAL HOPE AND EXISTENTIAL DESPAIR IN AI APOCALYPTICISM AND TRANSHUMANISM. Zygon®. 54(1). 24 indexed citations

7.

Singler, Beth. (2018). Roko’s Basilisk or Pascal’s? Thinking of Singularity Thought Experiments as Implicit Religion. Implicit Religion. 20(3). 279–297. 4 indexed citations

8.

Singler, Beth. (2018). An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Religion For the Religious Studies Scholar. Implicit Religion. 20(3). 215–231. 17 indexed citations

9.

Cave, Stephen, et al.. (2018). Portrayals and perceptions of AI and why they matter. Apollo (University of Cambridge). 87 indexed citations

10.

Singler, Beth. (2017). The Indigo Children. 1 indexed citations

11.

Singler, Beth. (2017). The Indigo Children: New Age Experimentation with Self and Science. 4 indexed citations

12.

Singler, Beth. (2015). Big Bad Pharma. Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions. 19(2). 17–29. 6 indexed citations

13.

Singler, Beth. (2014). “SEE MOM IT IS REAL”. Journal of Religion in Europe. 7(2). 150–168. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact