Beth Greenhill

18 papers receiving 237 citations

Peers

Beth Greenhill
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Safety Research 55
  • Clinical Psychology 92
  • General Health Professions 81
  • General Psychology 3
  • Social Psychology 48
Replace Jane Akister with:
Jane Akister United Kingdom
Elana Karshmer United States
Heather Thompson United States
Joan Hanafin Ireland
Mairi Ann Cullen United Kingdom
Ann Laybourn United Kingdom
Curtis Skinner United States
M. Loreto Martínez Chile
Duncan Moss United Kingdom
Colleen Loomis Canada
Beth Greenhill relative to Jane Akister United Kingdom Jane Akister's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Jane Akister · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Greenhill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Greenhill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Greenhill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Greenhill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Greenhill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Greenhill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Greenhill. The network helps show where Beth Greenhill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Beth Greenhill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Greenhill Line = papers co-authored together Beth Greenhill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201645
2 202333
3 201228
4 201127
5 202024
6 201617
7 201017
8 201213
9 201712
10 202011
11 20146
12 20216
13 20104
14 20242
15 20152
16 20221
17 20241
18 20171
19 20250
20 20240

About Beth Greenhill

Beth Greenhill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Safety Research and Education, having authored 20 papers that have together received 250 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (4 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (4 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (3 papers), Q Methodology Applications (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (2 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (55 citations), Clinical Psychology (92 citations), General Health Professions (81 citations), General Psychology (3 citations) and Social Psychology (48 citations). Beth Greenhill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Richard Whitehead, Amanda Roberts, Stephen Kellett, Melanie Simmonds‐Buckley, Andrew Jones, Jennifer Morris, Sarah Butchard, Veenu Gupta, Stephanie Allan and Alison Bryant. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, Research Involvement and Engagement, BMC Health Services Research and Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact