This map shows the geographic impact of Berndt Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Berndt Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berndt Keller more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Berndt Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Berndt Keller. The network helps show where Berndt Keller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Berndt Keller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Berndt Keller.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Berndt Keller based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Berndt Keller. Berndt Keller is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Keller, Berndt. (2013). THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN THE UNITED STATES AND GERMANY: COMPARATIVE ASPECTS IN AN EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS PERSPECTIVE. Comparative labor law & policy journal. 34(2). 415–441.3 indexed citations
3.
Bamber, Greg J., Philippe Pochet, Cameron Allan, et al.. (2010). Regulating employment relations, work and labour laws : international comparisons between key countries. Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia).2 indexed citations
4.
Keller, Berndt. (2010). Arbeitspolitik im öffentlichen Dienst : ein Überblick über Arbeitsmärkte und Arbeitsbeziehungen.6 indexed citations
Keller, Berndt & Hartmut Seifert. (2006). Flexicurity: wie lassen sich Flexibilität und soziale Sicherheit vereinbaren?. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 2685–2697.1 indexed citations
7.
Keller, Berndt & Hartmut Seifert. (2005). Flexicurity: Wie lassen sich Flexibilität und soziale Sicherheit vereinbaren? (Flexicurity - how can flexibility and social security be reconciled?). Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. 35(1). 90–106.1 indexed citations
8.
Keller, Berndt. (2004). Multibranchengewerkschaft als Erfolgsmodell? : Zusammenschlüsse als organisatorisches Novum - das Beispiel ver.di.6 indexed citations
9.
Keller, Berndt & Thomas Klein. (2003). Berufseinstieg und Mobilität von Akademikern zwischen Öffentlichem Dienst und Privatwirtschaft : Evidenz aus der Konstanzer Absolventenbefragung bei Diplom-Verwaltungswissenschaftlern. Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung. 27(2). 152–160.1 indexed citations
10.
Keller, Berndt. (2001). Ver.di: Triumphmarsch oder Gefangenenchor? : Neustrukturierung der Interessenvertretung im Dienstleistungssektor.6 indexed citations
11.
Keller, Berndt. (2001). Ver.di - was kommt nach der Ouvertüre?. Wirtschaftsdienst. 81(2). 92–101.1 indexed citations
Keller, Berndt. (1999). Towards the european re-birth of national corporatism? Some critical remarks on an empirical base. Comparative labor law & policy journal. 20(3). 507–518.1 indexed citations
14.
Keller, Berndt & Hartmut Seifert. (1998). Deregulierung am Arbeitsmarkt : Eine empirische Zwischenbilanz.5 indexed citations
15.
Jacobi, Otto & Berndt Keller. (1997). Arbeitsbeziehungen im öffentlichen Dienst Europas : Interessenvertretung und Mitbestimmung in der EU.
Keller, Berndt. (1983). Arbeitsbeziehungen im öffentlichen Dienst : Tarifpolitik der Gewerkschaften und Interessenpolitik der Beamtenverbände. Campus eBooks.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.