Peter Ellguth

38 papers receiving 524 citations

Peers

Peter Ellguth
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Public Administration 373
  • Political Science and International Relations 305
  • Economics and Econometrics 223
  • General Health Professions 199
  • Strategy and Management 68
Replace Thorsten Schulten with:
Thorsten Schulten Germany
Berndt Keller Germany
Stephanie Luce United States
Sabine Blaschke Austria
Niamh Hardiman Ireland
Christian Lyhne Ibsen Denmark
J. Visser
Bjarke Refslund Denmark
Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead Switzerland
Jon Erik Dølvik Norway
Peter Ellguth relative to Thorsten Schulten Germany Thorsten Schulten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Thorsten Schulten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ellguth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ellguth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ellguth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ellguth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ellguth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ellguth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ellguth. The network helps show where Peter Ellguth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ellguth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ellguth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ellguth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013109
2 2008102
3 201134
4 201928
5 201724
6 201324
7 201223
8 202121
9 201820
10 201617
11 201217
12 201516
13 202216
14 202016
15 201016
16
Betriebsspezifische Formen der Mitarbeitervertretung: welche Betriebe, welche personalpolitischen Wirkungen?
200914
17 201414
18 200613
19 199913
20 201612

About Peter Ellguth

Peter Ellguth is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 40 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (31 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (19 papers), Innovation, Technology, and Society (7 papers), European Socioeconomic and Political Studies (7 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (3 papers), Public Administration and Political Analysis (3 papers) and Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (373 citations), Political Science and International Relations (305 citations), Economics and Econometrics (223 citations), General Health Professions (199 citations) and Strategy and Management (68 citations). Peter Ellguth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Susanne Kohaut, Iris Möller, Hans‐Dieter Gerner, Rainer Trinczek, Jens Stegmaier, Lutz Bellmann, Rudi Schmidt, Markus Promberger, Florian Lehmer and Joseph W. Sakshaug. Their work appears in journals such as Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, Journal for Labour Market Research, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society), Economic and Industrial Democracy and DuEPublico (University of Duisburg-Essen).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact