Bent Dreyer

864 citations
36 papers · 647 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Bent Dreyer

32 papers receiving 585 citations

Peers

Bent Dreyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Strategy and Management 247
  • Management Information Systems 98
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 66
  • Food Science 157
  • Marketing 71
Replace Jon Henrich Hanf with:
Jon Henrich Hanf Germany
Armand Gilinsky United States
Martin Stack United States
Qiao Liang China
E.F.M. Wubben Netherlands
Andrea Ganzaroli Italy
H. Christopher Peterson United States
Décio Zylbersztajn Brazil
Marcello De Rosa Italy
Jaime Evaldo Fensterseifer Brazil
Bent Dreyer relative to Jon Henrich Hanf Germany Jon Henrich Hanf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Jon Henrich Hanf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bent Dreyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bent Dreyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bent Dreyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bent Dreyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bent Dreyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bent Dreyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bent Dreyer. The network helps show where Bent Dreyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Bent Dreyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bent Dreyer Line = papers co-authored together Bent Dreyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002227
2 2012102
3 201239
4 200935
5 202031
6 201224
7 201923
8 202021
9 200218
10 199518
11 202016
12 201214
13 201213
14 201111
15 201411
16
Evaluering av leveringsplikten
20067
17 20206
18 20205
19
Differences in harvesting and marketing strategies between Iceland and Norway
20154
20
Fangstbasert akvakultur – status, barrierer og potensial
20063

About Bent Dreyer

Bent Dreyer is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Global and Planetary Change, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Management Information Systems and Food Science, having authored 36 papers that have together received 647 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine and fisheries research (7 papers), Global trade and economics (4 papers), Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies (4 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (3 papers), Food Safety and Hygiene (3 papers), International Business and FDI (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Food Supply Chain Traceability (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (247 citations), Management Information Systems (98 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (66 citations), Food Science (157 citations) and Marketing (71 citations). Bent Dreyer has collaborated with scholars based in Norway and France. Frequent co-authors include Kjell Grønhaug, Kine Mari Karlsen, Petter Olsen, Edel O. Elvevoll, Øystein Hermansen, Geir Sogn‐Grundvåg, Dengjun Zhang, Kathryn Anne‐Marie Donnelly, Iciar Martı́nez and Gilles Bœuf. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Policy, Fisheries Research, British Food Journal, European Journal of Marketing and European Journal of Operational Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact