Benjamin Missbach

2.4k citations
20 papers · 1.6k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 14

Benjamin Missbach

20 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

Definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa...257201820262020202350100150200250

Peers

Benjamin Missbach
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Gastroenterology 125
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 658
  • Clinical Psychology 431
  • Applied Psychology 102
  • Physiology 393
Replace Sarah Dash with:
Sarah Dash Australia
Rachelle Opie Australia
Elena Philippou Cyprus
Tanja Sobko Sweden
Marta Stelmach-Mardas Poland
Wilrike J. Pasman Netherlands
Laima Brazionis Australia
Christopher R. D’Adamo United States
Cinzia Ferraris Italy
Elżbieta Grochans Poland
Benjamin Missbach relative to Sarah Dash Australia Sarah Dash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Sarah Dash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin Missbach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin Missbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin Missbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin Missbach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin Missbach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin Missbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin Missbach. The network helps show where Benjamin Missbach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin Missbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin Missbach Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin Missbach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202026
2 20191
3 20195
4
Definition and diagnostic criteria for orthorexia nervosa: a narrative review of the literaturebreakdown →
2018257
5 201713
6 201710
7 201728
8 201613
9 201636
10 2016259
11 201690
12 201617
13 201548
14 20159
15 20153
16 2015160
17 2015147
18 201424
19 2014246
20 2014184

About Benjamin Missbach

Benjamin Missbach is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Marketing and Sensory Systems, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diet and metabolism studies (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (3 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (125 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (658 citations), Clinical Psychology (431 citations), Applied Psychology (102 citations) and Physiology (393 citations). Benjamin Missbach has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Lukas Schwingshackl, Jürgen König, Georg Hoffmann, Sofia Dias, Sven Knüppel, Carolina Schwedhelm, Hellas Cena, Massimo Cuzzolaro, Anna Brytek‐Matera and Màrta Varga. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Advances in Nutrition, PLoS ONE, PeerJ and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026