Benjamin J. Li

1.3k citations
33 papers · 865 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Benjamin J. Li

30 papers receiving 823 citations

Peers

Benjamin J. Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Human-Computer Interaction 351
  • Applied Psychology 72
  • Social Psychology 280
  • Literature and Literary Theory 131
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 122
Replace Bartholomäus Wissmath with:
Bartholomäus Wissmath Switzerland
Janet B. Dean United States
Saskia Böcking Switzerland
Fernanda Herrera United States
Simo Järvelä Finland
Miguel Barreda-Ángeles Spain
Ana Sacau Portugal
J. Matias Kivikangas Finland
Francesca D’Errico Italy
Bernd Ploderer Australia
Benjamin J. Li relative to Bartholomäus Wissmath Switzerland Bartholomäus Wissmath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Bartholomäus Wissmath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Benjamin J. Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Benjamin J. Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Benjamin J. Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Benjamin J. Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Benjamin J. Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Benjamin J. Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Benjamin J. Li. The network helps show where Benjamin J. Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Benjamin J. Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Benjamin J. Li Line = papers co-authored together Benjamin J. Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019166
2 2017133
3 201687
4 201167
5 201662
6 201660
7 201446
8 202135
9 201728
10 202326
11 202226
12 202325
13 202115
14 202115
15 202414
16 202214
17 20229
18 20248
19
Effects of Message Completeness and Source Expertise in Online Health Discussion Boards
20194
20 20194

About Benjamin J. Li

Benjamin J. Li is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Applied Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 33 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (9 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (7 papers), Media Influence and Health (7 papers), Technostress in Professional Settings (6 papers), Action Observation and Synchronization (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers) and Image and Video Quality Assessment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (351 citations), Applied Psychology (72 citations), Social Psychology (280 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (131 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (122 citations). Benjamin J. Li has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include May O. Lwin, Jeremy N. Bailenson, Rabindra Ratan, David Beyea, Wonsun Shin, W Greenleaf, Adam Pines, Leanne M. Williams, Rebecca P. Ang and Soo Youn Oh. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Behaviour and Information Technology, Media Psychology, PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact