Adam Pines

84 total papers · 2.6k total citations
22 papers, 769 citations indexed

About

Adam Pines is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Adam Pines has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 769 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 4 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Adam Pines's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers). Adam Pines is often cited by papers focused on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (13 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (7 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers). Adam Pines collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Sweden. Adam Pines's co-authors include Theodore D. Satterthwaite, Leanne M. Williams, Valerie J. Sydnor, Danielle S. Bassett, Damien A. Fair, David R. Roalf, Benjamin J. Li, W Greenleaf, Jeremy N. Bailenson and Aaron Alexander‐Bloch and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Medicine and Neuron.

In The Last Decade

Adam Pines

21 papers receiving 763 citations

Hit Papers

Neurodevelopment of the a... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 2024 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Adam Pines 472 188 144 78 73 22 769
Darius A. Rohani 226 0.5× 104 0.6× 183 1.3× 50 0.6× 120 1.6× 31 623
Kentaro Morita 365 0.8× 132 0.7× 75 0.5× 49 0.6× 192 2.6× 42 702
Burak Erdeniz 490 1.0× 105 0.6× 122 0.8× 104 1.3× 75 1.0× 25 825
Krystyna A. Mathiak 636 1.3× 77 0.4× 255 1.8× 127 1.6× 125 1.7× 32 910
June Kang 323 0.7× 153 0.8× 107 0.7× 53 0.7× 114 1.6× 46 743
Romain Bouet 591 1.3× 82 0.4× 128 0.9× 47 0.6× 205 2.8× 47 844
Daisy G.Y. Thompson-Lake 188 0.4× 90 0.5× 157 1.1× 64 0.8× 47 0.6× 25 688
Roberta Riccelli 380 0.8× 166 0.9× 138 1.0× 40 0.5× 99 1.4× 23 801
Hedvig Söderlund 553 1.2× 95 0.5× 119 0.8× 66 0.8× 154 2.1× 25 819
Andrew E. Reineberg 681 1.4× 97 0.5× 250 1.7× 39 0.5× 71 1.0× 21 841

Countries citing papers authored by Adam Pines

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Pines's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Pines with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Pines more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Pines

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Pines. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Pines. The network helps show where Adam Pines may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Pines

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Pines. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Pines based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Pines. Adam Pines is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026