Ashley S. Bangert

1.1k total citations
21 papers, 820 citations indexed

About

Ashley S. Bangert is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Ashley S. Bangert has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 820 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Ashley S. Bangert's work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Ashley S. Bangert is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Music Perception (5 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Ashley S. Bangert collaborates with scholars based in United States. Ashley S. Bangert's co-authors include James A. Dixon, Robert C. Welsh, Linda Liu, Angela Gutchess, Trey Hedden, Denise C. Park, Meredith Minear, Patricia A. Reuter‐Lorenz, Rachael D. Seidler and Christine M. Walsh and has published in prestigious journals such as Developmental Psychology, Neuropsychologia and Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Ashley S. Bangert

21 papers receiving 803 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ashley S. Bangert United States 12 589 154 117 112 90 21 820
Jacqueline Cummine Canada 17 601 1.0× 384 2.5× 92 0.8× 124 1.1× 166 1.8× 61 812
Patrick H. Khader Germany 18 845 1.4× 126 0.8× 58 0.5× 115 1.0× 48 0.5× 29 1.0k
Anders Petersen Denmark 22 926 1.6× 163 1.1× 144 1.2× 245 2.2× 100 1.1× 57 1.2k
Andrea Peru Italy 15 598 1.0× 186 1.2× 49 0.4× 99 0.9× 24 0.3× 42 785
Éric Siéroff France 18 907 1.5× 160 1.0× 104 0.9× 107 1.0× 27 0.3× 53 1.1k
Chiara Spironelli Italy 22 1.1k 1.8× 368 2.4× 204 1.7× 164 1.5× 90 1.0× 61 1.3k
Laura Danelli Italy 13 450 0.8× 211 1.4× 112 1.0× 146 1.3× 46 0.5× 19 624
Zoe Woodhead United Kingdom 15 779 1.3× 224 1.5× 82 0.7× 122 1.1× 105 1.2× 38 978
Mélanie Jucla France 13 416 0.7× 283 1.8× 127 1.1× 48 0.4× 28 0.3× 28 595
Kyrana Tsapkini United States 23 1.1k 1.8× 625 4.1× 159 1.4× 121 1.1× 76 0.8× 55 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Ashley S. Bangert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ashley S. Bangert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ashley S. Bangert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ashley S. Bangert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ashley S. Bangert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ashley S. Bangert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ashley S. Bangert. The network helps show where Ashley S. Bangert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ashley S. Bangert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ashley S. Bangert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ashley S. Bangert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ashley S. Bangert. Ashley S. Bangert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Bangert, Ashley S., et al.. (2022). Using Technology to Teach Older Adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. 1–7. 1 indexed citations
3.
Morera, Osvaldo F., et al.. (2021). Perspectives of Interactions with Healthcare Providers Among Patients Who Are Blind. PubMed. 11(2). 11 indexed citations
4.
Bangert, Ashley S., et al.. (2019). Crossing event boundaries changes prospective perceptions of temporal length and proximity. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 82(3). 1459–1472. 17 indexed citations
5.
Bangert, Ashley S., Christopher A. Kurby, & Jeffrey M. Zacks. (2018). The influence of everyday events on prospective timing “in the moment”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 26(2). 677–684. 11 indexed citations
6.
Bangert, Ashley S., et al.. (2016). Recall and response time norms for English–Swahili word pairs and facts about Kenya. Behavior Research Methods. 49(1). 124–171. 6 indexed citations
7.
Lin, Yu-Cheng, Ashley S. Bangert, & Ana Schwartz. (2015). The devil is in the details of hand movement. The Mental Lexicon. 10(3). 364–389. 4 indexed citations
8.
Szabo‐Reed, Amanda N., Ashley S. Bangert, Patricia A. Reuter‐Lorenz, & Rachael D. Seidler. (2012). Physical activity is related to timing performance in older adults. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 20(3). 356–369. 5 indexed citations
9.
Bangert, Ashley S. & David A. Balota. (2012). Keep Up the Pace: Declines in Simple Repetitive Timing Differentiate Healthy Aging from the Earliest Stages of Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 18(6). 1052–1063. 38 indexed citations
10.
Bangert, Ashley S., Richard A. Abrams, & David A. Balota. (2012). Reaching for words and nonwords: Interactive effects of word frequency and stimulus quality on the characteristics of reaching movements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 19(3). 513–520. 16 indexed citations
11.
Bangert, Ashley S., Patricia A. Reuter‐Lorenz, & Rachael D. Seidler. (2010). Dissecting the clock: Understanding the mechanisms of timing across tasks and temporal intervals. Acta Psychologica. 136(1). 20–34. 41 indexed citations
12.
Fling, Brett W., Christine M. Walsh, Ashley S. Bangert, et al.. (2010). Differential Callosal Contributions to Bimanual Control in Young and Older Adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 23(9). 2171–2185. 85 indexed citations
13.
Bangert, Ashley S., et al.. (2009). Bimanual coordination and aging: Neurobehavioral implications. Neuropsychologia. 48(4). 1165–1170. 80 indexed citations
14.
Gutchess, Angela, et al.. (2005). Aging and the neural correlates of successful picture encoding. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 17. 1 indexed citations
15.
Gutchess, Angela, Robert C. Welsh, Trey Hedden, et al.. (2005). Aging and the Neural Correlates of Successful Picture Encoding: Frontal Activations Compensate for Decreased Medial-Temporal Activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 17(1). 84–96. 356 indexed citations
16.
Dixon, James A. & Ashley S. Bangert. (2004). From regularities to concepts: the development of children's understanding of a mathematical relation. Cognitive Development. 20(1). 65–86. 18 indexed citations
17.
Dixon, James A. & Ashley S. Bangert. (2004). On the spontaneous discovery of a mathematical relation during problem solving. Cognitive Science. 28(3). 433–449. 19 indexed citations
18.
Dixon, James A. & Ashley S. Bangert. (2002). The prehistory of discovery: Precursors of representational change in solving gear system problems.. Developmental Psychology. 38(6). 918–933. 33 indexed citations
19.
Dixon, James A. & Ashley S. Bangert. (2002). The prehistory of discovery: Precursors of representational change in solving gear system problems.. Developmental Psychology. 38(6). 918–933. 29 indexed citations
20.
Dixon, James A., et al.. (2001). The representations of the arithmetic operations include functional relationships. Memory & Cognition. 29(3). 462–477. 42 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026