Arthur S. Reber

12.7k total citations · 4 hit papers
93 papers, 6.8k citations indexed

About

Arthur S. Reber is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Arthur S. Reber has authored 93 papers receiving a total of 6.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 18 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Arthur S. Reber's work include Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (17 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (15 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (9 papers). Arthur S. Reber is often cited by papers focused on Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies (17 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (15 papers) and Action Observation and Synchronization (9 papers). Arthur S. Reber collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Arthur S. Reber's co-authors include František Baluška, Rhianon Allen, Don L. Scarborough, Saul M. Kassin, Gary W. Cantor, William B. Miller, Dominic W. Massaro, Richard B. Millward, Michael J. Abrams and Susan Regan and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and American Psychologist.

In The Last Decade

Arthur S. Reber

91 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Hit Papers

Implicit learning of arti... 1967 2026 1986 2006 1967 1989 1986 1977 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Arthur S. Reber United States 34 3.3k 3.1k 1.4k 1.1k 1.0k 93 6.8k
Zoltán Dienes United Kingdom 46 2.8k 0.9× 6.0k 1.9× 1.9k 1.4× 2.0k 1.8× 1.0k 1.0× 225 10.3k
Dare A. Baldwin United States 36 5.1k 1.6× 2.3k 0.7× 1.9k 1.4× 1.0k 0.9× 435 0.4× 76 7.1k
Peter C. Gordon United States 39 2.8k 0.8× 2.9k 0.9× 532 0.4× 1.7k 1.5× 1.1k 1.1× 119 5.5k
Axel Cleeremans Belgium 50 2.5k 0.8× 7.1k 2.2× 1.8k 1.3× 1.7k 1.5× 1.2k 1.1× 246 10.3k
Michael J. Spivey United States 34 2.1k 0.7× 3.7k 1.2× 1.4k 1.0× 2.5k 2.2× 633 0.6× 117 6.0k
Lyle E. Bourne United States 39 3.0k 0.9× 3.5k 1.1× 1.3k 0.9× 2.0k 1.8× 1.5k 1.5× 168 7.6k
Michael C. Frank United States 44 3.7k 1.1× 2.2k 0.7× 792 0.6× 1.9k 1.7× 1.6k 1.6× 243 7.8k
Harry Tily United States 13 3.0k 0.9× 4.0k 1.3× 1.1k 0.8× 2.8k 2.5× 1.4k 1.4× 18 8.2k
Gregory L. Murphy United States 47 4.2k 1.3× 2.4k 0.8× 1.6k 1.2× 3.2k 2.9× 2.2k 2.1× 147 8.9k
Victor Kuperman Canada 28 2.3k 0.7× 2.4k 0.8× 928 0.7× 1.8k 1.6× 1.8k 1.7× 100 5.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Arthur S. Reber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur S. Reber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur S. Reber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur S. Reber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur S. Reber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur S. Reber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur S. Reber. The network helps show where Arthur S. Reber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arthur S. Reber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arthur S. Reber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arthur S. Reber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arthur S. Reber. Arthur S. Reber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Miller, William B., Jaime F. Cárdenas‐García, František Baluška, et al.. (2025). A biogenic principle within the constructal law: The flow of information in biological systems. Biosystems. 256. 105553–105553.
2.
Baluška, František, William B. Miller, Predrag Slijepčević, & Arthur S. Reber. (2024). Sensing, feeling and sentience in unicellular organisms and living cells. Biosystems. 247. 105374–105374. 4 indexed citations
3.
Miller, William B., František Baluška, Arthur S. Reber, & Predrag Slijepčević. (2024). Biological mechanisms contradict AI consciousness: The spaces between the notes. Biosystems. 247. 105387–105387. 2 indexed citations
4.
Baluška, František, William B. Miller, & Arthur S. Reber. (2023). Sentient cells as basic units of tissues, organs and organismal physiology. The Journal of Physiology. 602(11). 2491–2501. 8 indexed citations
5.
Miller, William B., František Baluška, & Arthur S. Reber. (2023). A revised central dogma for the 21st century: All biology is cognitive information processing. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 182. 34–48. 21 indexed citations
6.
Reber, Arthur S., William B. Miller, Predrag Slijepčević, & František Baluška. (2023). The CBC theory and its entailments. EMBO Reports. 25(1). 8–12. 10 indexed citations
7.
Reber, Arthur S., František Baluška, & William B. Miller. (2022). Of course crustaceans are sentient: But there's more to the story. Animal Sentience. 7(32). 5 indexed citations
8.
Baluška, František & Arthur S. Reber. (2021). The Biomolecular Basis for Plant and Animal Sentience: Senomic and Ephaptic Principles of Cellular Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 28. 12 indexed citations
9.
Reber, Arthur S.. (2018). The First Minds: Caterpillars, Karyotes, and Consciousness. 24 indexed citations
10.
Reber, Arthur S.. (2017). What if all animals are sentient?. Animal Sentience. 2(16). 4 indexed citations
11.
Reber, Arthur S.. (2012). The EVF Model: A Novel Framework for Understanding Gambling and, by Extension, Poker. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal. 16(1). 13 indexed citations
12.
Reber, Arthur S., et al.. (2004). The structural mere exposure effect: The dual role of familiarity. 25(5). 274–277. 2 indexed citations
13.
Schellenberg, E. Glenn, et al.. (2003). Implicit Learning in Children and Adults With Williams Syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology. 23(1-2). 201–225. 10 indexed citations
14.
Reber, Arthur S., et al.. (2000). Another wrinkle on the dual-task SRT experiment: It’s probably not dual task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 7(2). 309–313. 38 indexed citations
15.
Dienes, Zoltán, et al.. (1997). Commentary. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 4(4). 587–591. 8 indexed citations
16.
Cleeremans, Axel, Dianne C. Berry, Zoltán Dienes, & Arthur S. Reber. (1995). No Matter Where You Go, There You Are. The American Journal of Psychology. 108(4). 589–589. 3 indexed citations
17.
Kushner, Michael, Axel Cleeremans, & Arthur S. Reber. (1991). Implicit detection of event interdependencies, and a PDP model of the process. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles). 215–220. 14 indexed citations
18.
Reber, Arthur S.. (1990). On the primacy of the implicit: Comment on Perruchet and Pacteau.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 119(3). 340–342. 54 indexed citations
19.
Reber, Arthur S., et al.. (1978). Children's Anagram Solutions as an Index of Linguistic and Cognitive Development. Child Development. 49(3). 765–765. 3 indexed citations
20.
Reber, Arthur S.. (1977). Implicit learning: An analysis of the form and structure of a body of tacit knowledge. Cognition. 5(4). 333–361. 189 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026