Annetta Smith
Impact in
- Research and Theory top 5%
- Nursing education and management
Papers in
-
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 3
- Co-authors
- Liz Forbat (2 shared papers)Clare Carolan (2 shared papers)Leah Macaden (12 shared papers)Lisa Page (1 shared paper)Andrea L. Dixon (1 shared paper)Richard G. Kyle (5 shared papers)Michelle Beattie (5 shared papers)Margaret Watson (6 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of research in nursing (2 papers)Nurse Education in Practice (2 papers)Rural and Remote Health (2 papers)Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (1 paper)BMJ Open (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Annetta Smith
32 papers receiving 372 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Research and Theory 33
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 31
- Family Practice 12
- General Health Professions 129
Countries citing papers authored by Annetta Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Annetta Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annetta Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annetta Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annetta Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annetta Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annetta Smith. The network helps show where Annetta Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Annetta Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 44 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 28 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 19 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 7 |
About Annetta Smith
Annetta Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Research and Theory and Physiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 386 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (6 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers) and Blood transfusion and management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (33 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (31 citations), Family Practice (12 citations) and General Health Professions (129 citations). Annetta Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Liz Forbat, Clare Carolan, Leah Macaden, Lisa Page, Andrea L. Dixon, Richard G. Kyle, Michelle Beattie, Margaret Watson, Anne Mason and Sylvia M. L. Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of research in nursing, Nurse Education in Practice, Rural and Remote Health, Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy and BMJ Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.