Richard G. Kyle
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Oncology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Gill HubbardIain AthertonLiz ForbatCatherine MahoneyLouise HoyleMuireann KellyRichard D NealJane Wills
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Health (13 papers)Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (13 papers)Emergency and Acute Care Studies (12 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Richard G. Kyle
107 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- General Health Professions 454
- Sociology and Political Science 219
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 214
- Oncology 198
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 174
Countries citing papers authored by Richard G. Kyle
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard G. Kyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard G. Kyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard G. Kyle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard G. Kyle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard G. Kyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard G. Kyle. The network helps show where Richard G. Kyle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard G. Kyle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard G. Kyle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard G. Kyle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard G. Kyle. Richard G. Kyle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 97 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | School-based Brief Psychoeducational Intervention To Raise Adolescent Cancer Awareness and Address Barriers to Seeking Medical Help about Cancer: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial | 1 |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | CAPTURE VS. COMPROMISE: ENTRY REGULATION OF INTRASTATE TRUCKING | 2 |
About Richard G. Kyle
Richard G. Kyle is a scholar working on Research and Theory, General Health Professions and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 116 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Health (13 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (13 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (38 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (28 citations) and Speech and Hearing (134 citations). Richard G. Kyle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Gill Hubbard, Iain Atherton, Liz Forbat, Catherine Mahoney, Louise Hoyle, Muireann Kelly, Richard D Neal, Jane Wills, Christine Milligan and Robin Kearns. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.