Anne H. Bishop
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Education
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Michael Edgar
- Topics
- Ethics in medical practice (3 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper)Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Anne H. Bishop
17 papers receiving 222 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- General Health Professions 112
- Sociology and Political Science 70
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 67
- Education 46
- Social Psychology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Anne H. Bishop
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne H. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne H. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne H. Bishop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne H. Bishop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne H. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne H. Bishop. The network helps show where Anne H. Bishop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne H. Bishop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne H. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne H. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne H. Bishop. Anne H. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Becoming an Ally: Breaking the Cycle of Oppression in People | 82 |
| 2 | Caring, Curing, Coping: Nurse, Physician, and Patient Relationships | 10 |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Caring, Curing, Coping | 8 |
| 5 | Beyond Token Change: Breaking the Cycle of Oppression in Institutions | 14 |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Beyond friendship and Eros : unrecognized relationships between men and women | 2 |
| 9 | Nursing Ethics: Holistic Caring Practice | 10 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | Case Critical: Challenging Social Services in Canada, by Ben Carniol | 1 |
| 15 | Nursing Ethics: Therapeutic Caring Presence | 40 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | Nursing: the practice of caring. | 28 |
| 18 | Cartoons and Soap Operas: Popular Education in a Nova Scotia Fish Plant. | 1 |
About Anne H. Bishop
Anne H. Bishop is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, having authored 18 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (1 paper) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (25 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations) and Public Administration (16 citations). Anne H. Bishop has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Edgar. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Outlook, Journal of Holistic Nursing and Nursing Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.