Jess Dillard‐Wright

530 citations
28 papers · 288 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jess Dillard‐Wright

26 papers receiving 281 citations

Peers

Jess Dillard‐Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 36
  • Research and Theory 20
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Cultural Studies 38
  • General Health Professions 108
Replace Jane Robinson with:
Jane Robinson United Kingdom
Carol McDonald Canada
Peter Morrall United Kingdom
Susan Luparell United States
Anne H. Bishop United States
DIANE HAMILTON United States
Suyen Karki Finland
Elisabeth Dahlborg Lyckhage Sweden
Carol Gordon Canada
Liisa Koskinen Finland
Jess Dillard‐Wright relative to Jane Robinson United Kingdom Jane Robinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×25.5×
Jane Robinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jess Dillard‐Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jess Dillard‐Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jess Dillard‐Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jess Dillard‐Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jess Dillard‐Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jess Dillard‐Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jess Dillard‐Wright. The network helps show where Jess Dillard‐Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jess Dillard‐Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jess Dillard‐Wright Line = papers co-authored together Jess Dillard‐Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202043
2 202134
3 202128
4 201927
5 202317
6 201917
7 202113
8 202311
9 202211
10 202210
11 20219
12 20229
13 20238
14 20237
15 20237
16 20246
17 20235
18 20234
19 20234
20 20234

About Jess Dillard‐Wright

Jess Dillard‐Wright is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, Cultural Studies and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 28 papers that have together received 288 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (6 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (5 papers), Disaster Response and Management (4 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (4 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (3 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (3 papers) and Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (36 citations), Research and Theory (20 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations), Cultural Studies (38 citations) and General Health Professions (108 citations). Jess Dillard‐Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Shena Gazaway, Rae Walker, Jamie Smith, Ryan Essex, Janice Gullick, Amélie Perron, Chelsea Derlan Williams, Jordon D. Bosse, Tiffany G. Townsend and Ethan C. Cicero. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Philosophy, Advances in Nursing Science, Nursing Inquiry, Nursing Outlook and Nursing Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact