Nursing Philosophy

750 papers and 11.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 750 papers published in Nursing Philosophy in the last decades have received a total of 11.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Nursing Philosophy usually cover General Health Professions (413 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (203 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (175 papers) specifically the topics of Ethics in medical practice (288 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (124 papers) and Patient Dignity and Privacy (116 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nursing Philosophy are John Paley, Keith Cash, Peter Benner, Derek Sellman, Steven D. Edwards, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella, John Drummond, P. Anne Scott, Simon Woods and Martin Lipscomb.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nursing Philosophy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nursing Philosophy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nursing Philosophy.

Countries where authors publish in Nursing Philosophy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nursing Philosophy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nursing Philosophy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nursing Philosophy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025